From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5540C433FE for ; Mon, 16 May 2022 23:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349583AbiEPX7J (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2022 19:59:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347881AbiEPX7E (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2022 19:59:04 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8A424093F; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:59:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=G2Pe5+/hZMZdxaHVnXju12u+Hh3e4wdzfN1LtoLlNGw=; b=vAuCHK0X/vS7yYqaqctkRFawfv t5zXLjdkNZ7efdtw/qXq6wgYjJ3ct1QChKD/5LIvAqWZYEiObflzCHg2iizO1leCqwTcj+5Edrntz Z+8gJq1gU1heFcKi/c2olMt9T0rWOZuvwzg/MLXZKWqNBvZmtwkAgEe5SAH9WczLotuKK7v/B5vPw rRWZsnQwQAH7ld1b5t6nK0RPdD3saDu/p/JGG8UCo5HMDAkrFcwUtBxPQBVCWJDA+vZcZndBbBBrS UYAgvDPtyzP1n+lqbfoKxGS7X+UtaCJHuTM4Y+rtiPAkbIGtgtfxVIlyNqeSSv1H57BqAEd3kah9b yeQLnUeA==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nqkc7-00ALvq-1l; Mon, 16 May 2022 23:58:59 +0000 Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 00:58:59 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Stefan Roesch Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, jack@suse.cz Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/16] iomap: use iomap_page_create_gfp() in __iomap_write_begin Message-ID: References: <20220516164718.2419891-1-shr@fb.com> <20220516164718.2419891-4-shr@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220516164718.2419891-4-shr@fb.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:47:05AM -0700, Stefan Roesch wrote: > This change uses the new iomap_page_create_gfp() function in the > function __iomap_write_begin(). > > No intended functional changes in this patch. But there is one. I don't know if it's harmful or not. > const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter); > - struct iomap_page *iop = iomap_page_create(iter->inode, folio); > + struct iomap_page *iop = to_iomap_page(folio); > loff_t block_size = i_blocksize(iter->inode); > loff_t block_start = round_down(pos, block_size); > loff_t block_end = round_up(pos + len, block_size); > + unsigned int nr_blocks = i_blocks_per_folio(iter->inode, folio); > size_t from = offset_in_folio(folio, pos), to = from + len; > size_t poff, plen; > + gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL; For the case where the folio is already uptodate, would need an iop to be written back (ie nr_blocks > 1) but doesn't have an iop, we used to create one here, and now we don't. How much testing has this seen with blocksize < 4k? > if (folio_test_uptodate(folio)) > return 0; > folio_clear_error(folio); > > + if (!iop && nr_blocks > 1) > + iop = iomap_page_create_gfp(iter->inode, folio, nr_blocks, gfp); > + > do { > iomap_adjust_read_range(iter->inode, folio, &block_start, > block_end - block_start, &poff, &plen); > -- > 2.30.2 > >