On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 03:16:55PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.05.2022 06:26, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > This would mean the allocation would need to be unconditional.  Right
> > now, I avoid the allocation if it is not necessary.
> 
> Hmm, I guess I don't see (taking into account also my own reply to that
> comment of mine) why it would need to become unconditional then.

It did not need to become unconditional.  See v5.

-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
Invisible Things Lab