From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EACCC433F5 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 14:51:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238393AbiEXOvW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2022 10:51:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60340 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234827AbiEXOvS (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2022 10:51:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6C8E1901F; Tue, 24 May 2022 07:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id h19-20020a05600c351300b003975cedb52bso1086675wmq.1; Tue, 24 May 2022 07:51:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=A65GoFYcm6DQ4llvUMUhGseX2zCfGwtwPKFwGEmKTeI=; b=f2YaW23LZ+T4D5Atsq96eFMCOd/uMwPTQB63En7fswG9ktA2R05gkrcf8py+pyMjf0 GUe5KeCY6W3mJzBDmZ1qaTZu7613u0QcIHD2HO/98ZeafJUo1AAec/W+G+qGVh69jQVR dC/VKxSpyurlLdcaSRztY+nw5wgS+gZJIeTdI6z1EADr6FWJICZgpiQe1Nh0g5ZwmbJt Y5skIGmzPWh8rX63tDgiw8PPU048JnLjR6Ky7BPVv5oKoX36CMV0C7GPTrmZo8fqYE2x dWDOkyrPhxVW4DEEaScdKev4/sbGSOBRiG0R/ijp6dIVO8C0WYlON+CGetrb7mTpKXwE WelQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=A65GoFYcm6DQ4llvUMUhGseX2zCfGwtwPKFwGEmKTeI=; b=1pXdUFbJA1LCYZfObmO7lk8r6zxAhag/hTUYbxZ/+CJt7d3duwa0XUbiT2dq3qPJUV /FfhlDo3Xmff2TBaBggrgwhtk55dJY7B0A8AwYOtVhGF6CD2Wf9yjnuldz5htYjgRj23 wWPJN8Phsi41aQMM4GVzPzRr6A1KCf5etMgm5kFEB+Tgto1PGHkEibo4p/MRw8sUErFV OwRiFc1azONhVEP8+PxOkKFoekm6Th55zhbtNGuf4J6B892scbpius5dF6lC2JiwMfk+ fjBu3NRpQuVdhQIc8MFrZtQHiGNUzXdDx5Ia9kz8l/JZ0MUbVkXE8wFaom+WOEzWpW2d 2u+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531eWUSGiLq7ZFa3fB4vDhcIZ8hnGsCj5uhiBuRctgLN69tOl71a THQhmyxuYsrEjpEQOUVHq/SzjdM2L1c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAyUxZPwpeM0FDgaFI8XxaTHYf8jWa+ECpb6AiLtvexxHA7kvAEJAGCWLX6t2aQPMyEz4gig== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c84:b0:394:5de0:245e with SMTP id k4-20020a05600c1c8400b003945de0245emr4216576wms.32.1653403875235; Tue, 24 May 2022 07:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-2-98-37-191.as13285.net. [2.98.37.191]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r4-20020a5d6c64000000b0020ff9802ee3sm1120157wrz.35.2022.05.24.07.51.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 May 2022 07:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 15:51:12 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/44] 4.19.245-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220523165752.797318097@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220523165752.797318097@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 07:04:44PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.245 release. > There are 44 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 May 2022 16:56:55 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 12.1.0): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 12.1.0): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 12.1.0): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 12.1.0): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1194 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip