From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37537ED2 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7798EC385A9; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:57:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1654261028; bh=BgxSOabF8NS37zOh6KbugrE/MEMF9mMNUdEJ5iL5IBk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MiP6OTFBDA92tEzIiGA3uLEDPs3VtM1bNSM+s+iigi4cMZxb03rZEEvXGa5O/TA8q dcAC3vhH6Kl+jTSeqZlQQfhMrOpycfqwp4p7sxpKyGyof2AYpf7vFY+LYkQWJZrArO K7f+YffaBKOijQSIaEnjAnyTtqMwuWF0tsv5mC8g= Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 14:57:05 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Sattler Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: boot loop since 5.17.6 Message-ID: References: <11495172-41dd-5c44-3ef6-8d3ff3ebd1b2@med.uni-frankfurt.de> <88b0eb42-41eb-af0e-285c-05f86a5c5fea@med.uni-frankfurt.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <88b0eb42-41eb-af0e-285c-05f86a5c5fea@med.uni-frankfurt.de> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 01:29:26AM +0200, Thomas Sattler wrote: > Am 02.06.22 um 22:08 schrieb Greg KH: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 06:14:43PM +0200, Thomas Sattler wrote: > > > After applying "patch-5.17.5-6.part198.patch" compilation is > > > broken. Still after applying "patch-5.17.5-6.part199.patch". > > > After applying "patch-5.17.5-6.part200.patch", compilation > > > works again but the resulting kernel now fails to boot. > > > > I have no idea what those random patches are, please can you say what > > the upstream commit is? > > I took what I reverted from patch-5.17.5-6.xz. In your tree it > matches what Nathan mentioned (60d2b0b1018a) plus d17f64c29512. > > Now, knowing that they were two patchsets, I compiled 5.17.12 > twice, once without 60d2b0b1018a and once without d17f64c29512. > > And it turns out it is 60d2b0b1018a which breaks my system. Does 5.18.1 also break for you? thanks, greg k-h