From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Amit Kucheria" <amitk@kernel.org>,
"Zhang Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"Linux PM list" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: improve logging during probe
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:26:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqH1AofgJVvSpW/x@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWEzhE8aAfsDRpzpv=ZFLb7Cn0r-En0K6O7heT6OA1JEA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 591 bytes --]
Hi Geert,
> > - dev_info(dev, "TSC%u: Loaded %d trip points\n", i, ret);
> > + dev_info(dev, "Sensor %u: Trip points loaded: %u\n", i, ret);
>
> I actually prefer the old wording (I'm undecided about "sensor" vs.
> "TSC", though, but consistency rules), as it makes it clear "ret"
> is the number of trip points, and not a success code.
I think "Sensor" is actually important. E.g. on Spider, Sensor 0 is TSC1
because there is no TSC0. So, the TSC numbering is confusing.
I'll try to reword it so that the number of points becomes clear again.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-09 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-25 15:12 [PATCH 1/2] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Add r8a779f0 support Wolfram Sang
2022-05-25 15:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: improve logging during probe Wolfram Sang
2022-05-25 17:15 ` Niklas Söderlund
2022-06-09 9:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-09 13:26 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2022-05-25 17:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Add r8a779f0 support Niklas Söderlund
2022-06-09 9:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqH1AofgJVvSpW/x@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=amitk@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.