All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@fb.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:52:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqMUPISvPs3ce1oi@noodles-fedora.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yp19W4/ZQm/8U+BG@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 12:06:51PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 05/12/22 at 04:25pm, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > On kexec file load Integrity Measurement Architecture (IMA) subsystem
> > may verify the IMA signature of the kernel and initramfs, and measure
> > it. The command line parameters passed to the kernel in the kexec call
> > may also be measured by IMA. A remote attestation service can verify
> > a TPM quote based on the TPM event log, the IMA measurement list, and
> > the TPM PCR data. This can be achieved only if the IMA measurement log
> > is carried over from the current kernel to the next kernel across
> > the kexec call.
> > 
> > powerpc and ARM64 both achieve this using device tree with a
> > "linux,ima-kexec-buffer" node. x86 platforms generally don't make use of
> > device tree, so use the setup_data mechanism to pass the IMA buffer to
> > the new kernel.
> 
> The entire looks good to me, other than a minor concern, please see the
> inline comment.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>

Thanks. Still waiting to see if Eric has any comments before deciding
whether to spin a v5 or not.

> Hi Coiby,
> 
> You can check this patch, see if you can take the same way to solve the
> LUKS-encrypted disk issue by passing the key via setup_data.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@fb.com>
> > ---
> ......snip...
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > index 170d0fd68b1f..54bd4ce5f908 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > @@ -186,6 +186,33 @@ setup_efi_state(struct boot_params *params, unsigned long params_load_addr,
> >  }
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_EFI */
> >  
> > +static void
> > +setup_ima_state(const struct kimage *image, struct boot_params *params,
> > +		unsigned long params_load_addr,
> > +		unsigned int ima_setup_data_offset)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
> > +	struct setup_data *sd = (void *)params + ima_setup_data_offset;
> > +	unsigned long setup_data_phys;
> > +	struct ima_setup_data *ima;
> > +
> > +	if (!image->ima_buffer_size)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	sd->type = SETUP_IMA;
> > +	sd->len = sizeof(*ima);
> > +
> > +	ima = (void *)sd + sizeof(struct setup_data);
> > +	ima->addr = image->ima_buffer_addr;
> > +	ima->size = image->ima_buffer_size;
> > +
> > +	/* Add setup data */
> > +	setup_data_phys = params_load_addr + ima_setup_data_offset;
> > +	sd->next = params->hdr.setup_data;
> > +	params->hdr.setup_data = setup_data_phys;
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC */
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int
> >  setup_boot_parameters(struct kimage *image, struct boot_params *params,
> >  		      unsigned long params_load_addr,
> > @@ -247,6 +274,13 @@ setup_boot_parameters(struct kimage *image, struct boot_params *params,
> >  	setup_efi_state(params, params_load_addr, efi_map_offset, efi_map_sz,
> >  			efi_setup_data_offset);
> >  #endif
> > +
> > +	/* Setup IMA log buffer state */
> > +	setup_ima_state(image, params, params_load_addr,
> > +			efi_setup_data_offset +
> > +			sizeof(struct setup_data) +
> > +			sizeof(struct efi_setup_data));
> 
> Is it a little better to update efi_setup_data_offset beforehand, or
> define a local variable?
> 
> 	efi_setup_data_offset += sizeof(struct setup_data) + sizeof(struct efi_setup_data));
> 	setup_ima_state(image, params, params_load_addr,
> 			efi_setup_data_offset));
> 
> No strong opinion. If nobody has concern about it.
> 
> > +
> >  	/* Setup EDD info */
> >  	memcpy(params->eddbuf, boot_params.eddbuf,
> >  				EDDMAXNR * sizeof(struct edd_info));
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@fb.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:52:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqMUPISvPs3ce1oi@noodles-fedora.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yp19W4/ZQm/8U+BG@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 12:06:51PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 05/12/22 at 04:25pm, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > On kexec file load Integrity Measurement Architecture (IMA) subsystem
> > may verify the IMA signature of the kernel and initramfs, and measure
> > it. The command line parameters passed to the kernel in the kexec call
> > may also be measured by IMA. A remote attestation service can verify
> > a TPM quote based on the TPM event log, the IMA measurement list, and
> > the TPM PCR data. This can be achieved only if the IMA measurement log
> > is carried over from the current kernel to the next kernel across
> > the kexec call.
> > 
> > powerpc and ARM64 both achieve this using device tree with a
> > "linux,ima-kexec-buffer" node. x86 platforms generally don't make use of
> > device tree, so use the setup_data mechanism to pass the IMA buffer to
> > the new kernel.
> 
> The entire looks good to me, other than a minor concern, please see the
> inline comment.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>

Thanks. Still waiting to see if Eric has any comments before deciding
whether to spin a v5 or not.

> Hi Coiby,
> 
> You can check this patch, see if you can take the same way to solve the
> LUKS-encrypted disk issue by passing the key via setup_data.
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@fb.com>
> > ---
> ......snip...
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > index 170d0fd68b1f..54bd4ce5f908 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > @@ -186,6 +186,33 @@ setup_efi_state(struct boot_params *params, unsigned long params_load_addr,
> >  }
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_EFI */
> >  
> > +static void
> > +setup_ima_state(const struct kimage *image, struct boot_params *params,
> > +		unsigned long params_load_addr,
> > +		unsigned int ima_setup_data_offset)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
> > +	struct setup_data *sd = (void *)params + ima_setup_data_offset;
> > +	unsigned long setup_data_phys;
> > +	struct ima_setup_data *ima;
> > +
> > +	if (!image->ima_buffer_size)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	sd->type = SETUP_IMA;
> > +	sd->len = sizeof(*ima);
> > +
> > +	ima = (void *)sd + sizeof(struct setup_data);
> > +	ima->addr = image->ima_buffer_addr;
> > +	ima->size = image->ima_buffer_size;
> > +
> > +	/* Add setup data */
> > +	setup_data_phys = params_load_addr + ima_setup_data_offset;
> > +	sd->next = params->hdr.setup_data;
> > +	params->hdr.setup_data = setup_data_phys;
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC */
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int
> >  setup_boot_parameters(struct kimage *image, struct boot_params *params,
> >  		      unsigned long params_load_addr,
> > @@ -247,6 +274,13 @@ setup_boot_parameters(struct kimage *image, struct boot_params *params,
> >  	setup_efi_state(params, params_load_addr, efi_map_offset, efi_map_sz,
> >  			efi_setup_data_offset);
> >  #endif
> > +
> > +	/* Setup IMA log buffer state */
> > +	setup_ima_state(image, params, params_load_addr,
> > +			efi_setup_data_offset +
> > +			sizeof(struct setup_data) +
> > +			sizeof(struct efi_setup_data));
> 
> Is it a little better to update efi_setup_data_offset beforehand, or
> define a local variable?
> 
> 	efi_setup_data_offset += sizeof(struct setup_data) + sizeof(struct efi_setup_data));
> 	setup_ima_state(image, params, params_load_addr,
> 			efi_setup_data_offset));
> 
> No strong opinion. If nobody has concern about it.
> 
> > +
> >  	/* Setup EDD info */
> >  	memcpy(params->eddbuf, boot_params.eddbuf,
> >  				EDDMAXNR * sizeof(struct edd_info));
> 
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-10  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22 13:50 [PATCH] Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec on x86_64 Jonathan McDowell
2022-04-25 16:29 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-26 12:08   ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-04-26 13:49     ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-26 16:48       ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-04-26 18:10         ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-28 10:40           ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-04-28 12:25             ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-26 16:52 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan McDowell
2022-04-29 21:30   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-05-03 12:02     ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-05-04 13:49       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-05-09 10:40   ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-05-09 11:25     ` Boris Petkov
2022-05-09 17:46       ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-05-09 18:09         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-09 18:41           ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-05-09 19:40             ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-10  8:02               ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-05-10 10:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-11  9:59   ` [PATCH v3] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec Jonathan McDowell
2022-05-11 17:53     ` Mimi Zohar
2022-05-11 17:56       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-11 19:12         ` Mimi Zohar
2022-05-12  1:34       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-05-12 16:25     ` [PATCH v4] " Jonathan McDowell
2022-05-13 17:19       ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2022-05-16 15:15         ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-05-17 17:19           ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2022-05-18 10:42             ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-05-18 14:43       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-05-30  8:40         ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-06-03 15:55           ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-03 15:55             ` Dave Hansen
2022-06-06  3:54             ` Baoquan He
2022-06-06  3:54               ` Baoquan He
2022-06-06  4:06       ` Baoquan He
2022-06-10  9:52         ` Jonathan McDowell [this message]
2022-06-10  9:52           ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-06-13 10:30       ` [PATCH v5] " Jonathan McDowell
2022-06-13 10:30         ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-06-13 21:01         ` Mimi Zohar
2022-06-13 21:01           ` Mimi Zohar
2022-06-16  2:59           ` Baoquan He
2022-06-16  2:59             ` Baoquan He
2022-06-16 15:30         ` [PATCH v6] " Jonathan McDowell
2022-06-16 15:30           ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-06-30  8:36           ` [PATCH v7] " Jonathan McDowell
2022-06-30  8:36             ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-06-30 11:54             ` Mimi Zohar
2022-06-30 11:54               ` Mimi Zohar
2022-07-04  2:36             ` Baoquan He
2022-07-04  2:36               ` Baoquan He
2022-06-27 11:56 ` [tip: x86/kdump] " tip-bot2 for Jonathan McDowell
2022-07-01 14:37 ` tip-bot2 for Jonathan McDowell
2022-07-07 16:52 ` [tip: x86/boot] " tip-bot2 for Jonathan McDowell
2022-07-07 17:37   ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-07-07 17:50     ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YqMUPISvPs3ce1oi@noodles-fedora.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=noodles@fb.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=coxu@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v4] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.