All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	chris.redpath@arm.com, qperret@google.com,
	kernel-team@android.com, Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 21:56:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqSe/7KKplsAUI7C@geo.homenetwork> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220607123254.565579-3-vdonnefort@google.com>

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:32:49PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:

> From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> 
> Before being migrated to a new CPU, a task sees its PELT values
> synchronized with rq last_update_time. Once done, that same task will also
> have its sched_avg last_update_time reset. This means the time between
> the migration and the last clock update will not be accounted for in
> util_avg and a discontinuity will appear. This issue is amplified by the
> PELT clock scaling. It takes currently one tick after the CPU being idle
> to let clock_pelt catching up clock_task.
> 
> This is especially problematic for asymmetric CPU capacity systems which
> need stable util_avg signals for task placement and energy estimation.
> 
> Ideally, this problem would be solved by updating the runqueue clocks
> before the migration. But that would require taking the runqueue lock
> which is quite expensive [1]. Instead estimate the missing time and update
> the task util_avg with that value.
> 
> To that end, we need sched_clock_cpu() but it is a costly function. Limit
> the usage to the case where the source CPU is idle as we know this is when
> the clock is having the biggest risk of being outdated. In this such case,
> let's call it cfs_idle_lag the delta time between the rq_clock_pelt value
> at rq idle and cfs_rq idle. And rq_idle_lag the delta between "now" and
> the rq_clock_pelt at rq idle.
> 
> The estimated PELT clock is then:
> 
>    last_update_time (the cfs_rq's last_update_time)
>    + cfs_idle_lag (delta between cfs_rq's update and rq's update)
>    + rq_idle_lag (delta between rq's update and now)
> 
>   last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_pelt()
>                    = rq_clock_pelt() - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time
> 
>   cfs_idle_lag = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle -
>                  rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> 
>   rq_idle_lag = sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> 
> The rq_clock_pelt() from last_update_time being the same as
> rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle, we can write:
> 
>   estimation = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time +
>                sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> 
> The clocks being not accessible without the rq lock taken, some timestamps
> are created:
> 
>       rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle        is rq->clock_pelt_idle
>       rq_clock()@rq_idle             is rq->enter_idle
>       cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time is cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle
> 
> The rq_idle_lag part of the missing time is however an estimation that
> doesn't take into account IRQ and Paravirt time.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190709115759.10451-1-chris.redpath@arm.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 05614d9b919c..77f3eb1bf624 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3310,6 +3310,29 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int flags)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static inline bool load_avg_is_decayed(struct sched_avg *sa)
> +{
> +	if (sa->load_sum)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (sa->util_sum)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (sa->runnable_sum)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * _avg must be null when _sum are null because _avg = _sum / divider
> +	 * Make sure that rounding and/or propagation of PELT values never
> +	 * break this.
> +	 */
> +	SCHED_WARN_ON(sa->load_avg ||
> +		      sa->util_avg ||
> +		      sa->runnable_avg);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static inline u64 cfs_rq_last_update_time(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
>  	return u64_u32_load_copy(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time,
> @@ -3347,27 +3370,12 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  	if (cfs_rq->load.weight)
>  		return false;
>  
> -	if (cfs_rq->avg.load_sum)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (cfs_rq->avg.util_sum)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (cfs_rq->avg.runnable_sum)
> +	if (!load_avg_is_decayed(&cfs_rq->avg))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	if (child_cfs_rq_on_list(cfs_rq))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * _avg must be null when _sum are null because _avg = _sum / divider
> -	 * Make sure that rounding and/or propagation of PELT values never
> -	 * break this.
> -	 */
> -	SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->avg.load_avg ||
> -		      cfs_rq->avg.util_avg ||
> -		      cfs_rq->avg.runnable_avg);
> -
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3706,6 +3714,89 @@ static inline void add_tg_cfs_propagate(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, long runnable_sum
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> +static inline void migrate_se_pelt_lag(struct sched_entity *se)
> +{
> +	u64 throttled = 0, now, lut;
> +	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
> +	struct rq *rq;
> +	bool is_idle;
> +
> +	if (load_avg_is_decayed(&se->avg))
> +		return;
> +
> +	cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> +	rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	is_idle = is_idle_task(rcu_dereference(rq->curr));
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The lag estimation comes with a cost we don't want to pay all the
> +	 * time. Hence, limiting to the case where the source CPU is idle and
> +	 * we know we are at the greatest risk to have an outdated clock.
> +	 */
> +	if (!is_idle)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Estimated "now" is: last_update_time + cfs_idle_lag + rq_idle_lag, where:
> +	 *
> +	 *   last_update_time (the cfs_rq's last_update_time)
> +	 *	= cfs_rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *      = rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *        - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 *   cfs_idle_lag (delta between cfs_rq's update and rq's update)
> +	 *      = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - rq_clock_pelt()@cfs_rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 *   rq_idle_lag (delta between rq's update and now)
> +	 *      = sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> +	 *
> +	 * We can then write:
> +	 *
> +	 *    now = rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle - cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time +
> +	 *          sched_clock_cpu() - rq_clock()@rq_idle
> +	 * Where:
> +	 *      rq_clock_pelt()@rq_idle        is rq->clock_pelt_idle
> +	 *      rq_clock()@rq_idle             is rq->clock_idle
> +	 *      cfs->throttled_clock_pelt_time@cfs_rq_idle is
> +	 *      cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle
> +	 */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	throttled = u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle);
> +	/* The clock has been stopped for throttling */
> +	if (throttled == U64_MAX)
> +		return;
> +#endif
> +	now = u64_u32_load(rq->clock_pelt_idle);
> +	/*
> +	 * Paired with _update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(). It ensures at the worst case
> +	 * is observed the old clock_pelt_idle value and the new clock_idle,
> +	 * which lead to an underestimation. The opposite would lead to an
> +	 * overestimation.
> +	 */

The sentence of 'The opposite would lead to an overestimation' means that
clock_pelt_idle is new clock_idle is old if I am not wrong. If clock_pelt_idle
is new then clock_idle is new too. The later is the updated state of both, IMHO
 this sentence does not stand.

> +	smp_rmb();
> +	lut = cfs_rq_last_update_time(cfs_rq);
> +
> +	now -= throttled;
> +	if (now < lut)
> +		/*
> +		 * cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time is more recent than our
> +		 * estimation, let's use it.
> +		 */
> +		now = lut;
> +	else
> +		now += sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - u64_u32_load(rq->clock_idle);
> +
> +	__update_load_avg_blocked_se(now, se);
> +}
> +#else
> +static void migrate_se_pelt_lag(struct sched_entity *se) {}
> +#endif
> +
>  /**
>   * update_cfs_rq_load_avg - update the cfs_rq's load/util averages
>   * @now: current time, as per cfs_rq_clock_pelt()
> @@ -4437,6 +4528,9 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
>  	 */
>  	if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) != DEQUEUE_SAVE)
>  		update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
> +
> +	if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 0)
> +		update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -6911,6 +7005,8 @@ static void detach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
>   */
>  static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
>  {
> +	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * As blocked tasks retain absolute vruntime the migration needs to
>  	 * deal with this by subtracting the old and adding the new
> @@ -6918,7 +7014,6 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
>  	 * the task on the new runqueue.
>  	 */
>  	if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) == TASK_WAKING) {
> -		struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
>  		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>  
>  		se->vruntime -= u64_u32_load(cfs_rq->min_vruntime);
> @@ -6930,25 +7025,29 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
>  		 * rq->lock and can modify state directly.
>  		 */
>  		lockdep_assert_rq_held(task_rq(p));
> -		detach_entity_cfs_rq(&p->se);
> +		detach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
>  
>  	} else {
> +		remove_entity_load_avg(se);
> +
>  		/*
> -		 * We are supposed to update the task to "current" time, then
> -		 * its up to date and ready to go to new CPU/cfs_rq. But we
> -		 * have difficulty in getting what current time is, so simply
> -		 * throw away the out-of-date time. This will result in the
> -		 * wakee task is less decayed, but giving the wakee more load
> -		 * sounds not bad.
> +		 * Here, the task's PELT values have been updated according to
> +		 * the current rq's clock. But if that clock hasn't been
> +		 * updated in a while, a substantial idle time will be missed,
> +		 * leading to an inflation after wake-up on the new rq.
> +		 *
> +		 * Estimate the missing time from the cfs_rq last_update_time
> +		 * and update sched_avg to improve the PELT continuity after
> +		 * migration.
>  		 */
> -		remove_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
> +		migrate_se_pelt_lag(se);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Tell new CPU we are migrated */
> -	p->se.avg.last_update_time = 0;
> +	se->avg.last_update_time = 0;
>  
>  	/* We have migrated, no longer consider this task hot */
> -	p->se.exec_start = 0;
> +	se->exec_start = 0;
>  
>  	update_scan_period(p, new_cpu);
>  }
> @@ -8114,6 +8213,9 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
>  		if (update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq)) {
>  			update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
>  
> +			if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 0)
> +				update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
> +
>  			if (cfs_rq == &rq->cfs)
>  				decayed = true;
>  		}
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/pelt.h b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> index 4ff2ed4f8fa1..3a0e0dc28721 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,25 @@ static inline void cfs_se_util_change(struct sched_avg *avg)
>  	WRITE_ONCE(avg->util_est.enqueued, enqueued);
>  }
>  
> +static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> +	assert_clock_updated(rq);
> +
> +	return rq->clock_pelt - rq->lost_idle_time;
> +}
> +
> +/* The rq is idle, we can sync to clock_task */
> +static inline void _update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	rq->clock_pelt  = rq_clock_task(rq);
> +
> +	u64_u32_store(rq->clock_idle, rq_clock(rq));
> +	/* Paired with smp_rmb in migrate_se_pelt_lag() */
> +	smp_wmb();
> +	u64_u32_store(rq->clock_pelt_idle, rq_clock_pelt(rq));
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * The clock_pelt scales the time to reflect the effective amount of
>   * computation done during the running delta time but then sync back to
> @@ -76,8 +95,7 @@ static inline void cfs_se_util_change(struct sched_avg *avg)
>  static inline void update_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
>  {
>  	if (unlikely(is_idle_task(rq->curr))) {
> -		/* The rq is idle, we can sync to clock_task */
> -		rq->clock_pelt  = rq_clock_task(rq);
> +		_update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -130,17 +148,23 @@ static inline void update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
>  	 */
>  	if (util_sum >= divider)
>  		rq->lost_idle_time += rq_clock_task(rq) - rq->clock_pelt;
> +
> +	_update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq);
>  }
>  
> -static inline u64 rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
> -	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> -	assert_clock_updated(rq);
> +	u64 throttled;
>  
> -	return rq->clock_pelt - rq->lost_idle_time;
> +	if (unlikely(cfs_rq->throttle_count))
> +		throttled = U64_MAX;
> +	else
> +		throttled = cfs_rq->throttled_clock_pelt_time;
> +
> +	u64_u32_store(cfs_rq->throttled_pelt_idle, throttled);
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
>  /* rq->task_clock normalized against any time this cfs_rq has spent throttled */
>  static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
> @@ -150,6 +174,7 @@ static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  	return rq_clock_pelt(rq_of(cfs_rq)) - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_pelt_time;
>  }
>  #else
> +static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { }
>  static inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
>  	return rq_clock_pelt(rq_of(cfs_rq));
> @@ -204,6 +229,7 @@ update_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq, s64 delta) { }
>  static inline void
>  update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(struct rq *rq) { }
>  
> +static inline void update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { }
>  #endif
>  
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index bf4a0ec98678..de5c99bea7be 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -648,6 +648,10 @@ struct cfs_rq {
>  	int			runtime_enabled;
>  	s64			runtime_remaining;
>  
> +	u64			throttled_pelt_idle;
> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> +	u64                     throttled_pelt_idle_copy;
> +#endif
>  	u64			throttled_clock;
>  	u64			throttled_clock_pelt;
>  	u64			throttled_clock_pelt_time;
> @@ -1020,6 +1024,12 @@ struct rq {
>  	u64			clock_task ____cacheline_aligned;
>  	u64			clock_pelt;
>  	unsigned long		lost_idle_time;
> +	u64			clock_pelt_idle;
> +	u64			clock_idle;
> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> +	u64			clock_pelt_idle_copy;
> +	u64			clock_idle_copy;
> +#endif
>  
>  	atomic_t		nr_iowait;
>  
> -- 
> 2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-11 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-07 12:32 [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-09 15:23   ` Tao Zhou
2022-06-14 11:45     ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-14 14:28       ` Tao Zhou
2022-06-21  8:32         ` Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during wakeup migration Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-08  9:53   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-06-11 13:56   ` Tao Zhou [this message]
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] sched, drivers: Remove max param from effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util() Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] sched/fair: Rename select_idle_mask to select_rq_mask Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] sched/fair: Use the same cpumask per-PD throughout find_energy_efficient_cpu() Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] sched/fair: Remove task_util from effective utilization in feec() Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] sched/fair: Remove the energy margin " Vincent Donnefort
2022-06-09 12:53 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] feec() energy margin removal Lukasz Luba
2022-06-14 11:47   ` Vincent Donnefort

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YqSe/7KKplsAUI7C@geo.homenetwork \
    --to=tao.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.