All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	david@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: improve hugetlb_vmemmap code readability
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:22:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqfUxscKfUhT35jR@monkey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yqb89waW/jcsgRgo@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net>

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:01:43PM +0800”, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 10:33:48AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 02:35:12PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > -static __init int hugetlb_vmemmap_sysctls_init(void)
> > > +static int __init hugetlb_vmemmap_init(void)
> > >  {
> > > +	const struct hstate *h;
> > > +	bool optimizable = false;
> > > +
> > >  	/*
> > > -	 * If "struct page" crosses page boundaries, the vmemmap pages cannot
> > > -	 * be optimized.
> > > +	 * There are only (RESERVE_VMEMMAP_SIZE / sizeof(struct page)) struct
> > > +	 * page structs that can be used when HVO is enabled.
> > >  	 */
> > > -	if (is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page)))
> > > -		register_sysctl_init("vm", hugetlb_vmemmap_sysctls);
> > > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(__NR_USED_SUBPAGE >= RESERVE_VMEMMAP_SIZE / sizeof(struct page));
> > 
> > I need to take another look, but from the first glance there is something
> > here that caught my eye.
> >
> 
> Thanks for taking a look. This is introduced in commit f41f2ed43ca5.
>  
> > > +
> > > +	for_each_hstate(h) {
> > > +		char buf[16];
> > > +		unsigned int size = 0;
> > > +
> > > +		if (hugetlb_vmemmap_optimizable(h))
> > > +			size = hugetlb_vmemmap_size(h) - RESERVE_VMEMMAP_SIZE;
> > > +		optimizable = size ? true : optimizable;
> > 
> > This feels weird, just use false instead of optimizable.
> >
> 
> This is a loop, we shoud keep "optimizable" as "true" as long as there is one
> hstate is optimizable. How about:
> 
>   if (size)
> 	optimizable = true;
> 
> > > +		string_get_size(huge_page_size(h), 1, STRING_UNITS_2, buf,
> > > +				sizeof(buf));
> > > +		pr_info("%d KiB vmemmap can be optimized for a %s page\n",
> > > +			size / SZ_1K, buf);
> > 
> > I do not have a strong opinion but I wonder whether this brings a lot.
> >
> 
> I thought the users can know what size HugeTLB is optimizable via
> this log.  E.g. On aarch64, 64KB HugeTLB cannot be optimizable.
> I do not have a strong opinion as well, if anyone think it is
> unnecessary, I'll drop it in next version.

I do not have a strong opinion.  I think it adds a little information.  For me,
the new logging of number of pages vmemmap optimized at boot seems a bit
redundant.  Here is a BEFORE/AFTER comparison.

BEFORE
------
[    0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=(hd0,msdos1)/vmlinuz-5.19.0-rc1-next-20220610+ root=UUID=49c13301-2555-44dc-847b-caabe1d62bdf ro console=tty0 console=ttyS0,115200 audit=0 transparent_hugepage=always hugetlb_free_vmemmap=on hugepages=512
...
[    0.330930] HugeTLB: can optimize 4095 vmemmap pages for hugepages-1048576kB
[    0.350450] HugeTLB: can optimize 7 vmemmap pages for hugepages-2048kB
[    0.359282] HugeTLB registered 1.00 GiB page size, pre-allocated 0 pages
[    0.359285] HugeTLB registered 2.00 MiB page size, pre-allocated 512 pages

AFTER
-----
[    0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=(hd0,msdos1)/vmlinuz-5.19.0-rc1-next-20220610+ root=UUID=49c13301-2555-44dc-847b-caabe1d62bdf ro console=tty0 console=ttyS0,115200 audit=0 transparent_hugepage=always hugetlb_free_vmemmap=on hugepages=512
...
[    0.409068] HugeTLB registered 1.00 GiB page size, pre-allocated 0 pages
[    0.409071] HugeTLB registered 2.00 MiB page size, pre-allocated 512 pages
[    1.246107] HugeTLB: 16380 KiB vmemmap can be optimized for a 1.00 GiB page
[    1.246110] HugeTLB: 28 KiB vmemmap can be optimized for a 2.00 MiB page
[    1.246123] HugeTLB: 512 huge pages whose vmemmap are optimized at boot

When I read those messages, I am not sure if 'optimized' is the best
word to use.  I know that using alloc/free throughout the code was
confusing.  But, wouldn't it perhaps be more clear to the end user if
the messages read?

HugeTLB: 16380 KiB vmemmap can be freed for a 1.00 GiB page

Also, how about having report_hugepages() call a routine that prints the
vmemmmap savings.  Then output could then look something like:

HugeTLB: registered 1.00 GiB page size, pre-allocated 0 pages
	 16380 KiB vmemmap can be freed for a 1.00 GiB page
HugeTLB: registered 2.00 MiB page size, pre-allocated 512 pages
	 28 KiB vmemmap can be free for a 2.00 MiB page

Not insisting on these changes.  Just wanted to share the ideas.


Overall, the code improvements look good.
-- 
Mike Kravetz

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-14  0:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-13  6:35 [PATCH 0/6] Simplify hugetlb vmemmap and improve its readability Muchun Song
2022-06-13  6:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: delete hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap_enabled() Muchun Song
2022-06-13  8:04   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-06-13 18:15   ` Mike kravetz
2022-06-20 16:57   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-06-13  6:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: optimize vmemmap_optimize_mode handling Muchun Song
2022-06-13  8:10   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-06-13  8:24     ` Muchun Song
2022-06-13 18:28   ` Mike kravetz
2022-06-13  6:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: introduce the name HVO Muchun Song
2022-06-13  8:13   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-06-13 15:39   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-14  3:15     ` Muchun Song
2022-06-13 21:19   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-06-14  3:17     ` Muchun Song
2022-06-15 14:51   ` Joao Martins
2022-06-16  3:28     ` Muchun Song
2022-06-16 22:27       ` Mike Kravetz
2022-06-17  7:49         ` Muchun Song
2022-06-13  6:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: move vmemmap code related to HugeTLB to hugetlb_vmemmap.c Muchun Song
2022-06-13  8:15   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-06-13 21:34   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-06-13  6:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param() Muchun Song
2022-06-13 21:43   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-06-13  6:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: improve hugetlb_vmemmap code readability Muchun Song
2022-06-13  8:33   ` Oscar Salvador
2022-06-13  9:01     ` Muchun Song
2022-06-14  0:22       ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2022-06-14  4:17         ` Muchun Song
2022-06-14 16:57           ` Mike Kravetz
2022-06-15 12:33             ` Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YqfUxscKfUhT35jR@monkey \
    --to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.