From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC23CC433EF
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:04:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S233728AbiFQTEg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 17 Jun 2022 15:04:36 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52150 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S229693AbiFQTEe (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 17 Jun 2022 15:04:34 -0400
Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01BDA41996
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
        References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:
        Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
        bh=5vYR7KSYeCrksqMEKKx6lAlNtUm65l3b2zgw5cBNVZY=; b=GmKG+czD9r+6YuXcOU0eGuv1mB
        bLV85SBAhzlxA68vumtThkIlv1ePcziOiXnzHAdxepI+RLkQk9w2XGgcn3GTfb7ZYkzLd4Dq8mb6S
        mOt6F67sMH9VKDc3ygsoKqZ5S2YjX9x/0lgsFa3xYCkzRAqYk4S4x92j3YO/NtakgEb2FNUbWJox4
        UaneyR3WbamjxPv7mKkMvi6shrVruBe0iUJYncdJxDTzxL8TaC9WsSxH/QsgF7DVVIpuBLU0eZmpf
        k9UxA7aok0jv9QVgUMM9F02u8xFe+E/+oxQZXH9KeSDecOQq5N33wsXWu0iBx9Ie2OqUtmMmr2spo
        FocKJ+uA==;
Received: from dhcp-077-249-017-003.chello.nl ([77.249.17.3] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net)
        by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
        id 1o2HGM-008l30-Dp; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:04:10 +0000
Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225])
        (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
         key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
        (Client did not present a certificate)
        by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A36300212;
        Fri, 17 Jun 2022 21:04:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 10E9F2020B7B6; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 21:04:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 21:04:08 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwlocks: do not starve writers
Message-ID: <YqzQKER4JRoudTJE@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20220617091039.2257083-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
 <YqxufxqsnHjVfQOs@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <2dd754f9-3a79-ed17-e423-6b411c3afb69@redhat.com>
 <CALvZod5ijDz=coEE8G8v_haPaKuUa5jHYzEwKvLVxHGphixsFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <2730b855-8f99-5a9e-707e-697d3bd9811d@redhat.com>
 <CANn89iJLWJMmNrLYQ0EU7_0Wri6c3Kn9vYMOiWu1Ds8Af2KOnw@mail.gmail.com>
 <7499dd05-30d1-669c-66b4-5cb06452b476@redhat.com>
 <CANn89iLxX_bqD8PvAkZXGWzKBKYxB3qaqQjxxdmoG91PfmvRnA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iLxX_bqD8PvAkZXGWzKBKYxB3qaqQjxxdmoG91PfmvRnA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 07:45:14PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Were rwlocks always unfair, and we have been lucky ?

Yes.