From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BCACCA47C for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233693AbiGLOpP (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:45:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233660AbiGLOpE (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:45:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7CF325C7F; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id v14so11497840wra.5; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:45:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Sa6iY3pzwir6onyo2+3SEdO5IslImquHb/B2ephjWNA=; b=LEESkbTjEcOU7bUoY8h448YndDqAvOl5l7XJabm8Ky5wETpujsDs2To2eLk/OT56a8 bhuKg+K4NgHXhY8ZEf3EDlkZ1WWgwMle85E6unzgzKAyqYOwB3v+FD5w9CMywRY2PZv7 PW5YkKBbuMNMSHpdc/SztIQHLluvga2JuHXZFyrFD3+gZ8jnC9wZjxnF1PGukc2KJodo 1HgZFMSgqjgBqrDdYAD1Nc6t3Pyb8mmCm8db40asy3ZlnWWz673zGAhBoWThCZjf0afl NsXvdoq+uK91mgSGYizB5Yb5ZXoVhN0BiJshuK3jdcN0P0TRHRhODGTnGwJupXNDuNoi xZQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Sa6iY3pzwir6onyo2+3SEdO5IslImquHb/B2ephjWNA=; b=v0MNUL/On6JuX0pOTQYN+ef/0h02lzYKPug2Ppkd3Y59Si3udWdYI8XdY8M0/jMohI tqlezLz9xTI2gTfacnsfzznUSkir93o9Z3vmu23mTSLHiUjZl3wiDC/8u3JL/wsD/vfF t+ig/2va3zRAs4CP68P7OLwG8EP4G7dHNLgHj73lIDWQLndKw5xibU+yq9RmUP6R7ltA QEmCnCrpg6QzCCVnkpoGUUOcKK1KQ/BkN955LiUdqsEhsUmnhzYzs4cIRM3hZHNEZpHN n086ZW3wpOLFzuQNlEBzc4f7p7AtCd5xzBJX9UWa78GWa9yUY2PLBzMhXSdyNWmtv/9S yDbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9+KIh0vX50b5jWChVXgBosBLDOQc6mmL2e3+Kyhm9Vpu2QYp99 mPbMWLfX8LznUh35sU1OyRw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1u9IqTISr1wyRgga0Wj5eYmfortujWr+8ZL/NhFS8z4Uf+MK9ThLDEiwzSF6wcgo4Oq15bSmw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:58cc:0:b0:21d:6919:7daf with SMTP id o12-20020a5d58cc000000b0021d69197dafmr22544454wrf.434.1657637101303; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-47-22.as13285.net. [78.150.47.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m4-20020a5d6244000000b0021d6e917442sm10180708wrv.72.2022.07.12.07.45.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:44:59 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/55] 5.10.130-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220711090541.764895984@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220711090541.764895984@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:06:48AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.130 release. > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:05:28 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220706): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1486 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1496 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip