All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
To: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	dsahern@kernel.org, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org,
	leon@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	michael.chan@broadcom.com, andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] devlink: introduce framework for selftests
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:40:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YswaKcUs6nOndU2V@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220707182950.29348-2-vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>

Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 08:29:48PM CEST, vikas.gupta@broadcom.com wrote:
>Add a framework for running selftests.
>Framework exposes devlink commands and test suite(s) to the user
>to execute and query the supported tests by the driver.
>
>Below are new entries in devlink_nl_ops
>devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_show: To query the supported selftests
>by the driver.
>devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_run: To execute selftests. Users can
>provide a test mask for executing group tests or standalone tests.
>
>Documentation/networking/devlink/ path is already part of MAINTAINERS &
>the new files come under this path. Hence no update needed to the
>MAINTAINERS
>
>Signed-off-by: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
>Reviewed-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
>Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com>
>---
> .../networking/devlink/devlink-selftests.rst  |  34 +++++
> include/net/devlink.h                         |  30 ++++
> include/uapi/linux/devlink.h                  |  26 ++++
> net/core/devlink.c                            | 144 ++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 234 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-selftests.rst
>
>diff --git a/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-selftests.rst b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-selftests.rst
>new file mode 100644
>index 000000000000..796d38f77038
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-selftests.rst
>@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>+
>+=================
>+Devlink Selftests
>+=================
>+
>+The ``devlink-selftests`` API allows executing selftests on the device.
>+
>+Tests Mask
>+==========
>+The ``devlink-selftests`` command should be run with a mask indicating
>+the tests to be executed.
>+
>+Tests Description
>+=================
>+The following is a list of tests that drivers may execute.
>+
>+.. list-table:: List of tests
>+   :widths: 5 90
>+
>+   * - Name
>+     - Description
>+   * - ``DEVLINK_SELFTEST_FLASH``
>+     - Runs a flash test on the device.
>+
>+example usage
>+-------------
>+
>+.. code:: shell
>+
>+    # Query selftests supported on the device
>+    $ devlink dev selftests show DEV
>+    # Executes selftests on the device
>+    $ devlink dev selftests run DEV test {flash | all}
>diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
>index 2a2a2a0c93f7..cb7c378cf720 100644
>--- a/include/net/devlink.h
>+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>@@ -1215,6 +1215,18 @@ enum {
> 	DEVLINK_F_RELOAD = 1UL << 0,
> };
> 
>+#define DEVLINK_SELFTEST_FLASH_TEST_NAME "flash"
>+
>+static inline const char *devlink_selftest_name(int test)

I don't understand why this is needed. Better not to expose string to
the user. Just have it as well defined attr.


>+{
>+	switch (test) {
>+	case DEVLINK_SELFTEST_FLASH_BIT:
>+		return DEVLINK_SELFTEST_FLASH_TEST_NAME;
>+	default:
>+		return "unknown";
>+	}
>+}
>+
> struct devlink_ops {
> 	/**
> 	 * @supported_flash_update_params:
>@@ -1509,6 +1521,24 @@ struct devlink_ops {
> 				    struct devlink_rate *parent,
> 				    void *priv_child, void *priv_parent,
> 				    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>+	/**
>+	 * selftests_show() - Shows selftests supported by device
>+	 * @devlink: Devlink instance
>+	 * @extack: extack for reporting error messages
>+	 *
>+	 * Return: test mask supported by driver
>+	 */
>+	u32 (*selftests_show)(struct devlink *devlink,
>+			      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>+	/**
>+	 * selftests_run() - Runs selftests
>+	 * @devlink: Devlink instance
>+	 * @tests_mask: tests to be run by driver
>+	 * @results: test results by driver
>+	 * @extack: extack for reporting error messages
>+	 */
>+	void (*selftests_run)(struct devlink *devlink, u32 tests_mask,
>+			      u8 *results, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> };
> 
> void *devlink_priv(struct devlink *devlink);
>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>index b3d40a5d72ff..1dba262328b9 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>@@ -136,6 +136,9 @@ enum devlink_command {
> 	DEVLINK_CMD_LINECARD_NEW,
> 	DEVLINK_CMD_LINECARD_DEL,
> 
>+	DEVLINK_CMD_SELFTESTS_SHOW,
>+	DEVLINK_CMD_SELFTESTS_RUN,
>+
> 	/* add new commands above here */
> 	__DEVLINK_CMD_MAX,
> 	DEVLINK_CMD_MAX = __DEVLINK_CMD_MAX - 1
>@@ -276,6 +279,25 @@ enum {
> #define DEVLINK_SUPPORTED_FLASH_OVERWRITE_SECTIONS \
> 	(_BITUL(__DEVLINK_FLASH_OVERWRITE_MAX_BIT) - 1)
> 
>+/* Commonly used test cases */
>+enum {
>+	DEVLINK_SELFTEST_FLASH_BIT,
>+
>+	__DEVLINK_SELFTEST_MAX_BIT,
>+	DEVLINK_SELFTEST_MAX_BIT = __DEVLINK_SELFTEST_MAX_BIT - 1
>+};
>+
>+#define DEVLINK_SELFTEST_FLASH _BITUL(DEVLINK_SELFTEST_FLASH_BIT)
>+
>+#define DEVLINK_SELFTESTS_MASK \
>+	(_BITUL(__DEVLINK_SELFTEST_MAX_BIT) - 1)
>+
>+enum {
>+	DEVLINK_SELFTEST_SKIP,
>+	DEVLINK_SELFTEST_PASS,
>+	DEVLINK_SELFTEST_FAIL
>+};
>+
> /**
>  * enum devlink_trap_action - Packet trap action.
>  * @DEVLINK_TRAP_ACTION_DROP: Packet is dropped by the device and a copy is not
>@@ -576,6 +598,10 @@ enum devlink_attr {
> 	DEVLINK_ATTR_LINECARD_TYPE,		/* string */
> 	DEVLINK_ATTR_LINECARD_SUPPORTED_TYPES,	/* nested */
> 
>+	DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTESTS_MASK,		/* u32 */

I don't see why this is u32 bitset. Just have one attr per test
(NLA_FLAG) in a nested attr instead.



>+	DEVLINK_ATTR_TEST_RESULT,		/* nested */
>+	DEVLINK_ATTR_TEST_NAME,			/* string */
>+	DEVLINK_ATTR_TEST_RESULT_VAL,		/* u8 */

Could you maintain the same "namespace" for all attrs related to
selftests?


> 	/* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */
> 
> 	__DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX,
>diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>index db61f3a341cb..0b7341ab6379 100644
>--- a/net/core/devlink.c
>+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>@@ -4794,6 +4794,136 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_flash_update(struct sk_buff *skb,
> 	return ret;
> }
> 
>+static int devlink_selftest_name_put(struct sk_buff *skb, int test)
>+{
>+	const char *name = devlink_selftest_name(test);
>+	if (nla_put_string(skb, DEVLINK_ATTR_TEST_NAME, name))
>+		return -EMSGSIZE;
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_show(struct sk_buff *skb,
>+					 struct genl_info *info)
>+{
>+	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
>+	struct sk_buff *msg;
>+	unsigned long tests;
>+	int err = 0;
>+	void *hdr;
>+	int test;
>+
>+	if (!devlink->ops->selftests_show)
>+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+
>+	msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>+	if (!msg)
>+		return -ENOMEM;
>+
>+	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq,
>+			  &devlink_nl_family, 0, DEVLINK_CMD_SELFTESTS_SHOW);
>+	if (!hdr)
>+		goto free_msg;
>+
>+	if (devlink_nl_put_handle(msg, devlink))
>+		goto genlmsg_cancel;
>+
>+	tests = devlink->ops->selftests_show(devlink, info->extack);
>+
>+	for_each_set_bit(test, &tests, __DEVLINK_SELFTEST_MAX_BIT) {
>+		err = devlink_selftest_name_put(msg, test);
>+		if (err)
>+			goto genlmsg_cancel;
>+	}
>+
>+	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
>+
>+	return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
>+
>+genlmsg_cancel:
>+	genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
>+free_msg:
>+	nlmsg_free(msg);
>+	return err;
>+}
>+
>+static int devlink_selftest_result_put(struct sk_buff *skb, int test,
>+				       u8 result)
>+{
>+	const char *name = devlink_selftest_name(test);
>+	struct nlattr *result_attr;
>+
>+	result_attr = nla_nest_start_noflag(skb, DEVLINK_ATTR_TEST_RESULT);
>+	if (!result_attr)
>+		return -EMSGSIZE;
>+
>+	if (nla_put_string(skb, DEVLINK_ATTR_TEST_NAME, name) ||
>+	    nla_put_u8(skb, DEVLINK_ATTR_TEST_RESULT_VAL, result))
>+		goto nla_put_failure;
>+
>+	nla_nest_end(skb, result_attr);
>+
>+	return 0;
>+
>+nla_put_failure:
>+	nla_nest_cancel(skb, result_attr);
>+	return -EMSGSIZE;
>+}
>+
>+static int devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_run(struct sk_buff *skb,
>+					struct genl_info *info)
>+{
>+	u8 test_results[DEVLINK_SELFTEST_MAX_BIT + 1] = {};
>+	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
>+	unsigned long tests;
>+	struct sk_buff *msg;
>+	u32 tests_mask;
>+	void *hdr;
>+	int err = 0;
>+	int test;
>+
>+	if (!devlink->ops->selftests_run)
>+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+
>+	if (!info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTESTS_MASK])
>+		return -EINVAL;
>+
>+	msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>+	if (!msg)
>+		return -ENOMEM;
>+
>+	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq,
>+			  &devlink_nl_family, 0, DEVLINK_CMD_SELFTESTS_RUN);
>+	if (!hdr)
>+		goto free_msg;
>+
>+	if (devlink_nl_put_handle(msg, devlink))
>+		goto genlmsg_cancel;
>+
>+	tests_mask = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTESTS_MASK]);
>+
>+	devlink->ops->selftests_run(devlink, tests_mask, test_results,

Why don't you run it 1 by 1 and fill up the NL message 1 by 1 too?


>+				    info->extack);
>+	tests = tests_mask;
>+
>+	for_each_set_bit(test, &tests, __DEVLINK_SELFTEST_MAX_BIT) {
>+		err = devlink_selftest_result_put(msg, test,
>+						  test_results[test]);
>+		if (err)
>+			goto genlmsg_cancel;
>+	}
>+
>+	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
>+
>+	return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
>+
>+genlmsg_cancel:
>+	genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
>+free_msg:
>+	nlmsg_free(msg);
>+	return err;
>+}
>+
> static const struct devlink_param devlink_param_generic[] = {
> 	{
> 		.id = DEVLINK_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_INT_ERR_RESET,
>@@ -9000,6 +9130,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy devlink_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
> 	[DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_PARENT_NODE_NAME] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING },
> 	[DEVLINK_ATTR_LINECARD_INDEX] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> 	[DEVLINK_ATTR_LINECARD_TYPE] = { .type = NLA_NUL_STRING },
>+	[DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTESTS_MASK] = NLA_POLICY_MASK(NLA_U32,
>+							DEVLINK_SELFTESTS_MASK),
> };
> 
> static const struct genl_small_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
>@@ -9361,6 +9493,18 @@ static const struct genl_small_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
> 		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_trap_policer_set_doit,
> 		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
> 	},
>+	{
>+		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_SELFTESTS_SHOW,
>+		.validate = GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT | GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP,
>+		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_show,

Why don't dump?


>+		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
>+	},
>+	{
>+		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_SELFTESTS_RUN,
>+		.validate = GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT | GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP,
>+		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_selftests_run,
>+		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
>+	},
> };
> 
> static struct genl_family devlink_nl_family __ro_after_init = {
>-- 
>2.31.1
>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-11 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-28 16:42 [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] add framework for selftests in devlink Vikas Gupta
2022-06-28 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] devlink: introduce framework for selftests Vikas Gupta
2022-06-29  5:05   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-28 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] bnxt_en: refactor NVM APIs Vikas Gupta
2022-06-28 16:42 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] bnxt_en: implement callbacks for devlink selftests Vikas Gupta
2022-07-07 18:29 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] add framework for selftests in devlink Vikas Gupta
2022-07-07 18:29   ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] devlink: introduce framework for selftests Vikas Gupta
2022-07-08  1:20     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-10  9:00       ` Ido Schimmel
2022-07-08  8:04     ` kernel test robot
2022-07-08 14:48     ` kernel test robot
2022-07-11 12:40     ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
     [not found]       ` <CAHLZf_t9ihOQPvcQa8cZsDDVUX1wisrBjC30tHG_-Dz13zg=qQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-07-12  6:28         ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-12 16:41           ` Vikas Gupta
2022-07-12 18:08             ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-13  6:40               ` Vikas Gupta
2022-07-13  7:28                 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-13 10:16                   ` Vikas Gupta
2022-07-13 10:22                     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-07-07 18:29   ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] bnxt_en: refactor NVM APIs Vikas Gupta
2022-07-07 18:29   ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] bnxt_en: implement callbacks for devlink selftests Vikas Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YswaKcUs6nOndU2V@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=vikas.gupta@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.