From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6402C04A68 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232784AbiG1OmT (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:42:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49028 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233007AbiG1OmA (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:42:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD2568DD7; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id d8so2458799wrp.6; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:41:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=aZFISERAvCB3NmFVS+M2rujlrdNM/5Xh+THD7cOT+5o=; b=EAnHLOIIav58uezzVkPExmYtGc1AoRmEfivX1X9sOpybdcryqE+WaAMN4p3MQPz7Mz 8wo9TVgYt6NWurqFwQxzS3uJPJ8KmmbY20EI3MNmnelQ29BXtl4rtQ8y9Q3FpGJYX0Fs ccs6yNOnsSivklcKFW+Ne5gehpou5S/M5Hp6a6kueCFUTdlYgRE8NA6iq4hUQ+8k6vL4 9QW/dPoYghsNn2Q/mC5CX/XnSN1BC+eyPnJmFOqFLf5yvdAMf3WnKRo+s0Q53s8uoF2/ wt25NTAgwZRNVVhgVLvtF7tEQ00rbdd96MJxbmSk+huXM31zTflA6xurlgy11siXUvMD pGHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=aZFISERAvCB3NmFVS+M2rujlrdNM/5Xh+THD7cOT+5o=; b=3l1nOaRjVxULI+CGmK9N9aX9ZokKjOAzTFR/CODGcAw+ygSU2K9TpzW/KYKNfb/sGW zHG8xpNF3Typg8i2BEInEPixHOCf65qZghWDwRGYgABcqIlp5dhfAl+NiDIThnyFXMWl fWZbjVrOdS4sVJ/C6ZdNHcZmDyPhIEfX3/m3VVKy0EVWOeIVC896paZkvlkqDDkx/loc ySV+UCjVh0fyN6q+vmDUxwI/YmP2GGui4xQjCJhUtakSM+Du7/0z8bUoHVGHKbYMIc8+ m5ztN3iszmPg7w5qZ+Fj8MnPxglbTV3RIa4PNO7zx/lenl6DkjQ8HaaEo6h/lNXqaket uedQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/EIBUGYlJP2lcqVK3gEvTsnoAUH6aDyEPpJqcFpbWjWmXEM50b 5ykJVJcyzNrncG09LdL3MBk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vrZox56aghHqqKhK3pXSHfUp4FyQ4hFF73KuJSVtMNOltczbTWNRZfn97gwD+MV7ErCEIamA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f94b:0:b0:21e:46fe:bcdb with SMTP id q11-20020adff94b000000b0021e46febcdbmr16645978wrr.143.1659019276279; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:41:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([2402:3a80:196b:933a:553c:d695:8a60:6d86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d6-20020adff2c6000000b0021f0452eca6sm1075166wrp.107.2022.07.28.07.41.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:41:04 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/87] 5.4.208-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220727161008.993711844@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220727161008.993711844@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 06:09:53PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.208 release. > There are 87 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:09:50 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220724): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1571 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip