All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: move ->bio_split to the gendisk
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 23:35:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YuKswxbzK9OBirGr@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5323f3a1-14ac-eafb-3b5a-493fea2e86f5@suse.de>

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:07:14AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 7/27/22 18:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Only non-passthrough requests are split by the block layer and use the
> > ->bio_split bio_set.  Move it from the request_queue to the gendisk.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
> > ---
> >   block/blk-core.c       | 9 +--------
> >   block/blk-merge.c      | 7 ++++---
> >   block/blk-sysfs.c      | 2 --
> >   block/genhd.c          | 8 +++++++-
> >   drivers/md/dm.c        | 2 +-
> >   include/linux/blkdev.h | 3 ++-
> >   6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> > index 123468b9d2e43..59f13d011949d 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-core.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> > @@ -377,7 +377,6 @@ static void blk_timeout_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >   struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(int node_id, bool alloc_srcu)
> >   {
> >   	struct request_queue *q;
> > -	int ret;
> >   	q = kmem_cache_alloc_node(blk_get_queue_kmem_cache(alloc_srcu),
> >   			GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, node_id);
> > @@ -396,13 +395,9 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(int node_id, bool alloc_srcu)
> >   	if (q->id < 0)
> >   		goto fail_srcu;
> > -	ret = bioset_init(&q->bio_split, BIO_POOL_SIZE, 0, 0);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		goto fail_id;
> > -
> >   	q->stats = blk_alloc_queue_stats();
> >   	if (!q->stats)
> > -		goto fail_split;
> > +		goto fail_id;
> >   	q->node = node_id;
> > @@ -439,8 +434,6 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue(int node_id, bool alloc_srcu)
> >   fail_stats:
> >   	blk_free_queue_stats(q->stats);
> > -fail_split:
> > -	bioset_exit(&q->bio_split);
> >   fail_id:
> >   	ida_free(&blk_queue_ida, q->id);
> >   fail_srcu:
> > diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> > index 6e29fb28584ef..30872a3537648 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> > @@ -331,18 +331,19 @@ static struct bio *bio_split_rw(struct bio *bio, struct request_queue *q,
> >   struct bio *__bio_split_to_limits(struct bio *bio, struct request_queue *q,
> >   		       unsigned int *nr_segs)
> >   {
> > +	struct bio_set *bs = &bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->bio_split;
> >   	struct bio *split;
> 
> What happens for nvme-multipath?
> While I know that we shouldn't split on a path, experience shows that we
> _will_ do it eventually.

You mean contiguous bios should be mapped to one same path? If yes, at
least the current block layer can't do that, here dm-mapth is same with
nvme-mpath, since bio is always split first, and the split small bio
can be mapped to other path.



Thanks,
Ming


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-28 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-27 16:22 bio splitting cleanups v4 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-27 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: change the blk_queue_split calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-27 16:29   ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-28  1:53   ` Damien Le Moal
2022-07-28  7:55   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-07-27 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: change the blk_queue_bounce " Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-28  7:56   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-07-27 16:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: move ->bio_split to the gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-28  8:07   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-07-28 14:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-28 15:35     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-07-27 16:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: move the call to get_max_io_size out of blk_bio_segment_split Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-28  8:08   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-07-27 16:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: move bio_allowed_max_sectors to blk-merge.c Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-27 16:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: pass struct queue_limits to the bio splitting helpers Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-26 18:30 bio splitting cleanups v3 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-26 18:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: move ->bio_split to the gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-23  6:28 bio splitting cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-23  6:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: move ->bio_split to the gendisk Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YuKswxbzK9OBirGr@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.