From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E99C19F29 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 17:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233114AbiHBRmY (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:42:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35812 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231132AbiHBRmW (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:42:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A166DF4E; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:42:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id bv3so4857047wrb.5; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:42:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=uMymkjvhOIcHe+sIXSnW+UwLBk8H2QUc7FOOoXpXHb8=; b=CVwJje0b8xNV+ysA9tcGpwaEVno/l6Tq8zWv67ZEG1DfK5dfpo+4C9fTA1CphUJ2da cNLz9c7GZrNl7TD0YRKB38XxC2jEGi3/KcrgPT+GHBMxkSliruQlyR1+ujfcWIL1AZXS gnkbDZ4IZic20zBg+IUusKcqSMCZy9Dim1VBgIit9s0V/Kxvh5ycx9jCIGrNFYYORssw os69pEp6+8JC4741xhtr9jON7usmqtfz8sWsKMROlIMfpDZPbfni4a/jsLnpuM6eFSKg eJ8Ch7l/OmbORXKiDPjrLPzkh5DjIBmSBzvNVn6OfoVW7m79/2MLnYC5Hb45FCYGPO+I KhUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=uMymkjvhOIcHe+sIXSnW+UwLBk8H2QUc7FOOoXpXHb8=; b=XeQsAbPhXvUFrVIwF17KqCWXupt3ZD4/lDD1MSfbK54iW6gp6YNYYGYmcy6f0zYETr GLiEJXPP3t4TbYzMekJZHORn5/VDaRj4SxhuXPoO3z6Oi35k5fOMp1G+iivZ50NahVqy 3BUDfadl2SWy93vLlXzgTurSu0aXuKjdro8r17FSUA6HPFOY7+vlglqv2OUTZy1yAGX0 OqFipSzU+XTl19tw+B8rFEBTIbabg/SOuRjSVTPWDIllL4wK98/UFwWWYEJFoVtiJiiM hdYocgm17jQxx+8bQ7Atho5AIJgurjd3jU7Y/0iMxmfFIOUg2EystWQXcqeJMyJjHBqz lKog== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0UpHy33J7jWaqh/LM5OM/K9ion7nw59lu7N3dv6n7xCEbavXOV EAoEo4mYbLHDSDO/2aKCw98= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4GttsrbDq2JcA/FdVMaSkFZw2cy0s/eZMfGRftJ3DZCpwitW95thj2EbUhKal9LHyP829itw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f6cb:0:b0:220:7859:7bf with SMTP id y11-20020adff6cb000000b00220785907bfmr789777wrp.683.1659462140622; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([2405:201:8005:8149:e5c9:c0ac:4d82:e94b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s14-20020a5d424e000000b0021d7fa77710sm15725446wrr.92.2022.08.02.10.42.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 18:42:09 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.18 00/88] 5.18.16-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220801114138.041018499@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220801114138.041018499@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 01:46:14PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.16 release. > There are 88 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Aug 2022 11:41:16 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.1.1 20220724): mips: 59 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1607 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1608 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1611 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip