From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619C0C00140 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 17:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235034AbiHBRp2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:45:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39138 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234168AbiHBRpU (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:45:20 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AFF812AD6; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id j1so10403933wrw.1; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:45:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=VX8txl3/+0QeRvpYY1TNyCvH4SHLM0g5nHUtDTMXGvY=; b=qJ5Y252mVpZk6bZEOKd1Vhc2Ct914CsDaJXcYw5Oyj8BzaD/s2hB8rLqbfrZ0AcNE9 4BCWJvh19iTX2kncXuHGrquMGgUo8A5eVAvlbf9SeJObzkfyUsNo8H+cLAjiQJY3Re3f BFZnmlDLYI0n6G0gwh5PUBhp5fW6/U8qGH1duHrRH2cDzJke6YxdXYhiFMFCm5iYEIe7 2OWRs5YDWsLIkRBEw2U+gMrJ0h+qeQ4cyTslVNai+l5Fv/jM/u6Sk6du4BHWxTqPExJY TGMdqCG7qfrXUVf1NIHOIPizNsQLPQDeZWtnaAql0e0GyDnHzI5mpa7kdlWnfrcZgZu0 imFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=VX8txl3/+0QeRvpYY1TNyCvH4SHLM0g5nHUtDTMXGvY=; b=C1fd/6Tywohu4L2zUWmVktuIBFCcyPb/vyj6fqNDd04lJKYjDE23diZQAj8qUZZAkC QsXUNqVXAI1p4bXCuOiL5docXYctMsde1RrZ3Hwy/0BbdVhrQ5NtT8A3gTgmWZ3fxkkc p77jf7s1jZzAjVHAu/z2GqXob1bqHNACszwr6To3FgEX8afE6+VQbgIlpxLhzHETsU89 0hL+9nuP6ncr5lL+86+iX5IuSUjOXg1pSUyDbVvA8NtKgeZVpyOz8D7Q/axcbD0JQFvL OIHyIrWSEue9movOGUydWHs+yN0JsLc6XffjysQW1Uvae/2u8qPaO+uoPd/xS4UMUoGI V23A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2BjEaqoSw7TrwiYnyb3rzqtBAwogFF91/WEinFp4SUduYHJZa8 w37lbcpQzYE8IDvOWJayAhc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7Ts2Nwr3SHbgBmaAKKbNiGFJzWfrtWVYze7AQUt1UOeuyj/zVqLRQjXvwHLdSw2gnhAaIHzw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ea0a:0:b0:220:6222:ee48 with SMTP id q10-20020adfea0a000000b002206222ee48mr7124681wrm.243.1659462317490; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:45:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([2405:201:8005:8149:e5c9:c0ac:4d82:e94b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id az13-20020a05600c600d00b003a32490c95dsm24209807wmb.35.2022.08.02.10.45.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:45:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 18:45:06 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/69] 5.15.59-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220801114134.468284027@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220801114134.468284027@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 01:46:24PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.59 release. > There are 69 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Aug 2022 11:41:16 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220724): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1604 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1610 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1612 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip