All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Vudum, Lakshminarayana" <lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx]  ✗ Fi.CI.BAT:  failure for Sanitycheck PCI BARs (rev2)
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 13:26:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvFxjNxVQxSmRHOH@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <165972129824.21185.15994720755028174389@emeril.freedesktop.org>

On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 05:41:38PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: Sanitycheck PCI BARs (rev2)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/106927/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11971 -> Patchwork_106927v2
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_106927v2 absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_106927v2, please notify your bug team to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/index.html
> 
> Participating hosts (43 -> 41)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   Missing    (2): bat-dg2-8 fi-bdw-samus 
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_106927v2:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live@guc_hang:
>     - fi-cfl-8109u:       [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc_hang.html
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc_hang.html

<7> [377.940383] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:lspcon_init [i915]] No LSPCON detected, found unknown
<3> [377.940571] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Failed to probe lspcon

This wouldn't be caused by Piotr's patches.  It looks like this is
pre-existing bug https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5904

@Lakshmi, can you help check the filter and re-report the CI results so
that CI shards testing of Piotr's series can continue?

Thanks.


Matt

> 
>   
> #### Suppressed ####
> 
>   The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
>   They do not affect the overall result.
> 
>   * igt@i915_module_load@load:
>     - {bat-dg2-10}:       [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4]
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/bat-dg2-10/igt@i915_module_load@load.html
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/bat-dg2-10/igt@i915_module_load@load.html
> 
>   
> Known issues
> ------------
> 
>   Here are the changes found in Patchwork_106927v2 that come from known issues:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Issues hit ####
> 
>   * igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
>     - fi-cfl-8109u:       [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6] ([i915#62])
>    [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm:
>     - fi-cfl-8109u:       [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-WARN][8] ([i915#5904]) +29 similar issues
>    [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm.html
>    [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm.html
> 
>   * igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915:
>     - fi-cfl-8109u:       [PASS][9] -> [DMESG-WARN][10] ([i915#5904] / [i915#62])
>    [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915.html
>    [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915.html
> 
>   * igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915:
>     - fi-bdw-5557u:       [PASS][11] -> [INCOMPLETE][12] ([i915#146])
>    [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915.html
>    [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
>     - fi-cfl-8109u:       [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-WARN][14] ([i915#62]) +12 similar issues
>    [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
>    [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
> 
>   
> #### Possible fixes ####
> 
>   * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
>     - {bat-rplp-1}:       [DMESG-WARN][15] ([i915#2867]) -> [PASS][16]
>    [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/bat-rplp-1/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem.html
>    [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/bat-rplp-1/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem.html
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live@slpc:
>     - {bat-rpls-1}:       [DMESG-FAIL][17] ([i915#6367]) -> [PASS][18]
>    [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@slpc.html
>    [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@slpc.html
> 
>   
> #### Warnings ####
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
>     - bat-dg1-5:          [DMESG-FAIL][19] ([i915#4957]) -> [DMESG-FAIL][20] ([i915#4494] / [i915#4957])
>    [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/bat-dg1-5/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
>    [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/bat-dg1-5/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
>     - bat-dg1-6:          [DMESG-FAIL][21] ([i915#4494] / [i915#4957]) -> [DMESG-FAIL][22] ([i915#4957])
>    [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11971/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
>    [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
> 
>   
>   {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
>           the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
> 
>   [i915#146]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/146
>   [i915#2867]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2867
>   [i915#4494]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4494
>   [i915#4957]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4957
>   [i915#5904]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5904
>   [i915#62]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/62
>   [i915#6367]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6367
> 
> 
> Build changes
> -------------
> 
>   * Linux: CI_DRM_11971 -> Patchwork_106927v2
> 
>   CI-20190529: 20190529
>   CI_DRM_11971: 2bdae66c9988dd0f07633629c0a85383cfc05940 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
>   IGT_6614: fbb4a4058b8f4119a079b2fda5c94aaacd850a78 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
>   Patchwork_106927v2: 2bdae66c9988dd0f07633629c0a85383cfc05940 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
> 
> 
> ### Linux commits
> 
> 4e46a15b7ddf drm/i915: Sanitycheck PCI BARs
> 79faae70c394 drm/i915: Use of BARs names instead of numbers
> 
> == Logs ==
> 
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_106927v2/index.html

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-08 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-05 15:59 [PATCH v3 0/2] Sanitycheck PCI BARs Piorkowski, Piotr
2022-08-05 15:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Piorkowski, Piotr
2022-08-05 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: Use of BARs names instead of numbers Piorkowski, Piotr
2022-08-05 15:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Piorkowski, Piotr
2022-08-10 10:53   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-08-10 11:31     ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-05 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915: Sanitycheck PCI BARs Piorkowski, Piotr
2022-08-05 15:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Piorkowski, Piotr
2022-08-10 10:39   ` Jani Nikula
2022-08-10 10:39     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-08-05 17:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Sanitycheck PCI BARs (rev2) Patchwork
2022-08-05 17:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-08-08 20:26   ` Matt Roper [this message]
2022-08-08 20:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-08-08 23:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YvFxjNxVQxSmRHOH@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.