All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Linyu Yuan <quic_linyyuan@quicinc.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 5.19] NULL dereference by ucsi_acpi driver
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 20:40:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwEqtGB2WldUeiEN@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r11cmbx0.wl-tiwai@suse.de>

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 06:32:43PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we've got multiple reports about 5.19 kernel starting crashing after
> some time, and this turned out to be triggered by ucsi_acpi driver.
> The details are found in:
>   https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202386
> 
> The culprit seems to be the commit 87d0e2f41b8c
>     usb: typec: ucsi: add a common function ucsi_unregister_connectors()

Adding Heikki to the thread...

>     
> This commit looks as if it were a harmless cleanup, but this failed in
> a subtle way.  Namely, in the error scenario, the driver gets an error
> at ucsi_register_altmodes(), and goes to the error handling to release
> the resources.  Through this refactoring, the release part was unified
> to a funciton ucsi_unregister_connectors().  And there, it has a NULL
> check of con->wq, and it bails out the loop if it's NULL. 
> Meanwhile, ucsi_register_port() itself still calls destroy_workqueue()
> and clear con->wq at its error path.  This ended up in the leftover
> power supply device with the uninitialized / cleared device.
> 
> It was confirmed that the problem could be avoided by a simple
> revert.

I'll be glad to revert this now, unless Heikki thinks:

> 
> I guess another fix could be removing the part clearing con->wq, i.e.
> 
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
> @@ -1192,11 +1192,6 @@ static int ucsi_register_port(struct ucsi *ucsi, int index)
>  out_unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&con->lock);
>  
> -	if (ret && con->wq) {
> -		destroy_workqueue(con->wq);
> -		con->wq = NULL;
> -	}
> -
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> 
> ... but it's totally untested and I'm not entirely sure whether it's
> better.

that is any better?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-21  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-19 16:32 [REGRESSION 5.19] NULL dereference by ucsi_acpi driver Takashi Iwai
2022-08-20 18:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-08-22  2:44   ` Linyu Yuan
2022-08-30 12:51     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-30 12:53       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-22 13:24   ` Heikki Krogerus
2022-08-23  2:26     ` Linyu Yuan
2022-08-23  6:41       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-23  6:52         ` Takashi Iwai
2022-08-24  9:50 ` Thorsten Leemhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YwEqtGB2WldUeiEN@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_linyyuan@quicinc.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.