On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:59:56PM -0500, Joseph Reynolds wrote: > On 9/1/22 6:27 AM, Patrick Williams wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 01:09:10PM -0500, Joseph Reynolds wrote: > > > >> 2  Proposal for dynamic changes to Redfish authorization rules > >> https://gerrit.openbmc.org/c/openbmc/docs/+/56401 > >> > >> > >> No discussion. > > Does "no discussion" mean? > > - This topic was not covered. > > - Nobody present seemed to have an opinion. > > - Everyone present was onboard with it as-is. > > > > I'm trying to gauge where consensus is at. > > I use "no discussion" when the topic was introduces and described, but > nobody expressed any interest or asked any questions.  I think someone > asked for the review link, which was already in the agenda. <-- Is there > a better way I could say this in the meeting minutes? > When an agenda item is skipped or omitted from the meeting, I'll put > something like "the following topics were not covered" with the reason why. Thank you for the clarification. I assumed it was either 2 or 3 from my list above. Sounds like you are using "no discussion" to mean 2. -- Patrick Williams