From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E50C38145 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 20:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MMcBZ5vlxz3bl0 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 06:17:42 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=lMb+hoPJ; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=URSGRGaI; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=stwcx.xyz (client-ip=66.111.4.27; helo=out3-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=lMb+hoPJ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=URSGRGaI; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MMc9h6SGmz2xn5 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 06:16:55 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D675C0105; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:16:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Sep 2022 16:16:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h=cc :cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1662495410; x=1662581810; bh=Cqw8qFnSZi zYQVIDrvDC4k229veTAXJaS0do6DjiSjA=; b=lMb+hoPJO9HdmzJcBB+hLAW/IG T1BvfDLjO2kZTb6gQg0xESy8EeIASjjLDSUwFeZVZJfgPRdtOmbojGh9BycPMcFQ vwG4GYty0m5gKzW31NcysKY7u8Se6agEcro7GOuUJ6N1vIs6viUjaA9uhYoq94MJ 2rHzGv4/LIYXatbWC/pmii9dilKUTFqj5BNdKnx6XiXBiN8Eb2hH0hAVyQcjosiO IAed++NfM3uMwo7cSF08/tTxcqE1usBqZKk00Vhx+38sJGJnf9OY4Ku5YEpeqv6o eWgacJfN1Yn44ykrayh6t44ub3GMejAknqs1RNXW1kVR5IABHmLBvB2BSyrA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1662495410; x=1662581810; bh=Cqw8qFnSZizYQVIDrvDC4k229veT AXJaS0do6DjiSjA=; b=URSGRGaIObz0hLvp2AvRBJXMQfXbFo3y261cYNr724wT wN3JIDXWp/Rwm9zKn+aFEPz+M027+pk8ovdwegv5HeaBxe835NvAqXsclTm3iRa4 eQiAKQguP74FyYhxQSScpM9COJtZFUIgh+LIhEeeQkBK3F037PYJzqPI36Ju75lS uajlRQGKSKShe0vgLelWV9BbqEWSXwZ1GmeAlTcCt9EfxafKcAi3ijzK1nWth8NO 1FMukNEMaAGMM6SoeAvbOUXCT8kMkQF24mnNPCug/kAhk+1+0iuYN/r2D6n8EnQZ aCZ/DsqfcEwgsqFpgtzk2tQqZPOo4WKg9hmvtRBS0Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrvdelkedgudegkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enfghrlhcuvffnffculddvfedmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreer tddtudenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgtkhcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceophgrthhrihgtkh esshhtfigtgidrgiihiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgedthfehgeeljeeigfevhfdu kedtjeejhfeuheeigeevvddtgfekiefhjedtleelnecuffhomhgrihhnpehophgvnhgsmh gtrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mhepphgrthhrihgtkhesshhtfigtgidrgiihii X-ME-Proxy:

Feedback-ID: i68a1478a:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:16:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 15:16:48 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: Joseph Reynolds Subject: Re: Security Working Group meeting - Wednesday August 31 - results Message-ID: References:

<3ffc663e-82d9-1ba8-9a47-9b5876ab2dc7@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1aKXMd00iPOm/Okn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ffc663e-82d9-1ba8-9a47-9b5876ab2dc7@linux.ibm.com> X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: openbmc Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" --1aKXMd00iPOm/Okn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:59:56PM -0500, Joseph Reynolds wrote: > On 9/1/22 6:27 AM, Patrick Williams wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 01:09:10PM -0500, Joseph Reynolds wrote: > > > >> 2=A0 Proposal for dynamic changes to Redfish authorization rules > >> https://gerrit.openbmc.org/c/openbmc/docs/+/56401 > >> > >> > >> No discussion. > > Does "no discussion" mean? > > - This topic was not covered. > > - Nobody present seemed to have an opinion. > > - Everyone present was onboard with it as-is. > > > > I'm trying to gauge where consensus is at. >=20 > I use "no discussion" when the topic was introduces and described, but=20 > nobody expressed any interest or asked any questions.=A0 I think someone= =20 > asked for the review link, which was already in the agenda. <-- Is there= =20 > a better way I could say this in the meeting minutes? > When an agenda item is skipped or omitted from the meeting, I'll put=20 > something like "the following topics were not covered" with the reason wh= y. Thank you for the clarification. I assumed it was either 2 or 3 from my list above. Sounds like you are using "no discussion" to mean 2. --=20 Patrick Williams --1aKXMd00iPOm/Okn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAmMXqq4ACgkQqwNHzC0A wRkB+g/+NYhieWI/HW3b3aWUdXRT4u+HvZXZ7nFPhY/EAYWVU0BzeTazVWC3PtP2 IrHjAeaFQF4QTPcO5ClnqUCPYiG/EXH8ITuUgIJpR3T1i8Fv/Ic5gUloPQ2jLL4f X+ISlYyNzrvLEDXAMJdBdOJDevdEwKozGi6U4Bsc6W5nYTSbI3ZQxrWglLWqqbdk 3zWef8XG96FAkl7Eqr+NAFzHG1lMH5l5R27g62lGeGd2xvsDC/80TeQw4Yk/ISLf UkxQ/kQ9/Du/pp1LJF90A0idPmKa5I4rRYBJMWoLrINjf8DwfAjH5Yv7tjDzCevk 5kVgzlU1EB0OBkxH461wo9hFaj8d66secbXVft3hdgkLbOTUq3A3vwAygnJmelR/ 2Yw5dKg6CtCqhMq9QMNVYI9zHnwZR54SWb/wrEK1moMDjVq3Sv6pwwkTGDqASjXG xreobQutjJyjJENzzpvpN9ORMz4hoGT94s92BNxQ3udtOGGHvH7Ion8J3O+ShB8f F1aivqyRHEBp1f6l+b59R9x+DU67fRiT4eMmd4DKmVnthRJWV4uPPTA6yhVZdlHz exiD2Tb308/s7DPc41R7OG7WZYmen3O3oBeJA8qQrA4f1qLJ+77Njc1I63YhsAIQ 8l4NngPNdwT3LnzrJviQjuPfqFZw4hE0oXXRjt79rN9BVoEhZuU= =Nl3v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1aKXMd00iPOm/Okn--