All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:43:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyHod22zbMjkh8iY@alfio.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyHmK0sc2r1G7x5i@intel.com>

Hi Anshuman,

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:33:15AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 07:45:53PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> > DG1 and DG2 has lmem, and cpu can access the lmem objects
> > via mmap and i915 internal i915_gem_object_pin_map() for
> > i915 own usages. Both of these methods has pre-requisite
> > requirement to keep GFX PCI endpoint in D0 for a supported
> > iomem transaction over PCI link. (Refer PCIe specs 5.3.1.4.1)
> > 
> > TODO:
> > With respect to i915_gem_object_pin_map(), every caller
> > has to grab a wakeref if gem object lies in lmem.
> > 
> > Till we fix all issues related to runtime PM, we need
> > to keep runtime PM disable on both DG1 and DG2.
> > 
> > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > index 77e7df21f539..f31d7f5399cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > @@ -931,6 +931,26 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg1_info = {
> >  		BIT(VCS0) | BIT(VCS2),
> >  	/* Wa_16011227922 */
> >  	.__runtime.ppgtt_size = 47,
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 *  FIXME: Temporary hammer to disable rpm.
> > +	 *  As per PCIe specs 5.3.1.4.1, all iomem read write request over a PCIe
> > +	 *  function will be unsupported in case PCIe endpoint function is in D3.
> > +	 *  But both DG1/DG2 has a hardware bug that violates the PCIe specs

/has/have/

> > +	 *  and supports the iomem read write transaction over PCIe bus despite

/supports/support/

> > +	 *  endpoint is D3 state.
> > +	 *  Due to above H/W bug, we had never observed any issue with i915 runtime
> > +	 *  PM versus lmem access.
> > +	 *  But this issue gets discover when PCIe gfx endpoint's upstream

/gets discover/becomes visible/

> > +	 *  bridge enters to D3, at this point any lmem read/write access will be
> > +	 *  returned as unsupported request. But again this issue is not observed
> > +	 *  on every platform because it has been observed on few host machines
> > +	 *  DG1/DG2 endpoint's upstream bridge does not binds with pcieport driver.

/binds/bind/

> > +	 *  which really disables the PCIe power savings and leaves the bridge to D0
> > +	 *  state.
> > +	 *  Let's disable i915 rpm till we fix all known issue with lmem access in D3.
> > +	 */
> > +	.has_runtime_pm = 0,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const struct intel_device_info adl_s_info = {
> > @@ -1076,6 +1096,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info dg2_info = {
> >  	XE_LPD_FEATURES,
> >  	.__runtime.cpu_transcoder_mask = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) | BIT(TRANSCODER_B) |
> >  			       BIT(TRANSCODER_C) | BIT(TRANSCODER_D),
> > +	.has_runtime_pm = 0,
> 
> The FIXME msg can be smaller, but it also needs to be here.

I actually like the comment, is very clear and helps
understanding the issue :)

Thanks again for addressing the issue and with the hope to see
the proper fix soon:

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Andi

> With this in place fell free to use:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> 
> Since the proper solution might take a while let's protect from this case,
> regardless of any other on going discussion about the force_probe protection.
> 
> 
> >  	.require_force_probe = 1,
> >  };
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.26.2
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-14 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-14 14:15 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm Anshuman Gupta
2022-09-14 14:33 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-09-14 14:43   ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2022-09-14 14:50     ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-14 15:35       ` Andi Shyti
2022-09-14 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm (rev2) Patchwork
2022-09-14 16:05   ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-14 16:09     ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-14 16:34       ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2022-09-14 16:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm Anshuman Gupta
2022-09-15  6:47   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-09-15  7:19     ` Gupta, Anshuman
2022-09-15 14:44   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2022-09-14 16:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm (rev2) Patchwork
2022-09-14 17:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm (rev3) Patchwork
2022-09-15  9:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-13  7:32 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/DG{1, 2}: FIXME Temporary hammer to disable rpm Anshuman Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyHod22zbMjkh8iY@alfio.lan \
    --to=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.