From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDAAC54EE9 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 14:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229652AbiIQOFi (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:05:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36026 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229457AbiIQOFf (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:05:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D27242EF29; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id c11so40275267wrp.11; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:05:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=DyhsNkvxmBnjPCqtatS4dOP83t+vwVI/Jo8B+cg3r7Y=; b=EVfrO/yHQqRYq5/ajb2/bx/iUmr8Emne1f+rftqZQkDsB4MovsLHeQMOzDIP5FylHN yIT6YeC9ZRPH/9UppP4UbimEFhtwNn0oEGhQdzgoMhImcTh0ycSwFLnVdKAfKE7HQZQB ldXhuUy2OSkk9Pquk/Z4qBdqFJuFLnBZzKRri4E+FwPuswrwtfCqQaBZwmVRxB4QjP4o TepUz+v1y0qodPEIs8UgDKuDt95cJScAwFzdPrju6lHsO7g1Fk5vpOxn1nbwFrKPCjd5 4hrCueLPslp/QAqi/JBYVw03D7kdmD7Ew5hcCuHXQLEWdhGAYKF78SlzIteIEpASdy7M fZVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=DyhsNkvxmBnjPCqtatS4dOP83t+vwVI/Jo8B+cg3r7Y=; b=5XrVXelCqC26G9dVgjppl3oQmbovrsJDc3KBr6LAfMjLrvHJAh3Pw+Arv+rE9DI164 ERRecJizU2eLMIXEwJHGmuBrvDT/+HmKUnezNHZlFq9NQ6U0SEy6dktUf8hh5vFdBCmt A5rI8+JgUV0lC8UBoLQQmg8M86KKeonMxRTl5uusvAOxQcgyhzFyyjM1U7d2L198QZFW juCRJIHTxxgRtITM3IFlM7rLlKjQu0uSbVkaV8eCWJlOJo0T6wtUXO5aBhmogbEHMFFx BoZ1BCT74uav6BRhklFRdXmaYpm4+M4xg/YO8SvK9cmeimaIF29DZEU0hbCoFLUBSkRF yT9g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2QOnhiRiPk9BZB3v8MSSG04AYHVp4PMrlkYR2iqJWEnLup9fSi xSOlzSKi9qXonUgFIMtjqJc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6C4ct6EfbSpzE2mbQdTedzaPpI8GwsGX3fLZHMy43qEOvo7PdD92NrX2mSbU6Yn4tGN/GzlA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:552:b0:228:6296:3b33 with SMTP id b18-20020a056000055200b0022862963b33mr6073651wrf.615.1663423532339; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x12-20020a05600c2d0c00b003b47575d304sm7401622wmf.32.2022.09.17.07.05.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 15:05:29 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/14] 5.4.214-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220916100443.123226979@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220916100443.123226979@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:08:07PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.214 release. > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 18 Sep 2022 10:04:31 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1843 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip