From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AABFECAAD3 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 14:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229678AbiIQOJp (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:09:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39408 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229633AbiIQOJm (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:09:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBF3EA447; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id cc5so30464413wrb.6; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=pYbqr2aNSQFCJHmzjmksLP49N3LtXcB9vNHYigKSSVs=; b=HiqH78Kdk4LcaRNy0dm2QjIAS3gNnDqSywE3ziG0txsoTjDDkgQaLg1Wni2axMT0ue 0Pk92kVVcyKRzowlwHScfIi2rnVqdDNYzc+MNtMx8hprCkDhYPnq2SDK0K5x3NXmywwM zVqWCOg3XmCtI6JjFouZhonYvmXa7lNwoANIkL06m61iEc+bAukmLHwM3wrJOxW+4zO0 yHk+Oy0zK0RPTlYVS3pe1LuM8s4bu92BMOZ69NpMcyrCzrdO/qAN55Ul1VCFbMXr8nFO sbtzf/xFURLhj2v+Dl5ZhMrJM6Maxb1u/geLF/y3BbAaOa1lYiq1jWsoua2lMB30FtYh frvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=pYbqr2aNSQFCJHmzjmksLP49N3LtXcB9vNHYigKSSVs=; b=g+PM9iWCptMdUnljv9Xccq4ps27cgXYbguR+Usp89fx/lcKlk4V74tjNwuNL5DS3lN iiuNVDQ+OHgpJk2WQNRQEQzZGAzI0MM5PjR3rn7Lkwlg4n2P5Urim0IYtcZZbaSv7rf8 nnqinldD/DHlfz9+O56n4b4P7m9ydisyslBtuEWW54pz7WrojwUnp+HbXeQuBvjCVtTA zTsdrTClDeNQxb+WX9b0JiXX+hQio+TXSMr2JAY5YMNoQHHAPk5T4wkvdBH+rcMuOBmo xIJFD+hdvxMfpe5O2kA6rAOImuterIw9va01UHZ2Eg68ifQLE0fEuuNXlMEVhKc9mJ9k dMGA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf102nlHQOoeab12BzxB/x6aJ6sB52osBcpc2e4eQO2s0xIacD9X nekU7dF1UqTjKWnLD4naH2w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6C1cgsU+Wbq62GHr4yf2QxG2l5XT6+Y39IGB1UFy7mWTWEP8b4DnaeYvwv6FifXfaGbAPcbw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:540d:0:b0:22a:4069:1e3e with SMTP id g13-20020a5d540d000000b0022a40691e3emr5771318wrv.239.1663423778267; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:09:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j15-20020a5d618f000000b0022af63bb6f2sm355570wru.113.2022.09.17.07.09.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 07:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 15:09:35 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/35] 5.15.69-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220916100446.916515275@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220916100446.916515275@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:08:23PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.69 release. > There are 35 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 18 Sep 2022 10:04:31 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220819): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1845 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1848 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1850 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip