From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8802C54EE9 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:57:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=iTei7+1jesHzBTzakF09RsjJEjxR8g+TJS8TXQ//7CU=; b=T0ezFG3sstmfRM X8Qh7MzaHx+vGEwRdo6WUksZ0XMn45hDsHlO+T3FApYl1nQtXMjactth3qm00uBit2V7bdqmy+ENR L9Tdz00s0NknWVCnFN2akZx2m+bpJ6PAH/aDo9K+I+Cscv+mDj5IMhpqCZPI8u5uxBb4t9cH+pqRy PYXVH7x4Sd+Evy4atdPen6QZUgcdsCDZ2TRUpmvAHFgm9C8Bd9ftZw3odXnXCuNV05hc3hwZPhPvy zzxn5MFQoe1b4CUYsEW+/s247uav6NzofYMAAPfOIISYpRUGd920jApKEQIqQuZeu8DsPwY3luYRW T0PCKxEyl1SNwOKsautQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oagYb-005HK9-FE; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:57:13 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([145.40.73.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oagYY-005HIU-8e for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:57:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D63CE19CD; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF674C433C1; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:57:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1663693023; bh=90qrbtTDZSrLP+0IRejeJNo4OYKsU9a720uvmW8b7UM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rc79zwJmsfbix8+q++BIS5ydiePVNvX84CMPmGRtpu+h+dS/XS8wz/eqKPuHMI0yP AKmNliPVlbMECRsG6AwfOAjQjO3U6t360mW0IcaC8BEzkq0+7oeQpF1/DJsYuz6Of8 2pQd+kJGzhvUDnb5fT/amu0uj8CfOSHPbU1Ww49XUwiAm9ufo2JMwzYSEWjcswA94f uAXl2Sb2ksR2cjt/nPuEdPEDnqh8kR8QEuumU9SYtKt1evHHN2+EockhHdix+TLtlN kM4CVGRddtkyHBhV2/6qjnlmGK4ORGmxzoxOGLrwO459pM+x0SnDE18DSjYMtDTKnk KhION+L0SvCYA== Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:56:59 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: RISC-V: Fix a typo in patch-acceptance Message-ID: References: <20220920140138.27210-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220920140138.27210-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220920_095710_513783_1B12B045 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.37 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 07:01:37AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > I just stumbled on this when modifying the docs. > > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt > --- > Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > index dfe0ac5624fb..5da6f9b273d6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > +++ b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ their own custom extensions. These custom extensions aren't required > to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V > Foundation. To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential > performance impact of adding kernel code for implementor-specific s/implementor/implementer no? Or is this an American spelling? > -RISC-V extensions, we'll only to accept patches for extensions that > +RISC-V extensions, we'll only accept patches for extensions that > have been officially frozen or ratified by the RISC-V Foundation. > (Implementors, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees > containing code for any custom extensions that they wish.) > -- > 2.34.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv