From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7395EC54EE9 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230479AbiI0LA3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:00:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52668 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231623AbiI0LAZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:00:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A6027B06; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id x18so14390724wrm.7; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:00:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=8Dw7PnH+G2Bh6k4CKjwpqJqAR4B+90JCnNrI22kvuHk=; b=Lc3Cav/OwSRwG1/9OrtThBRc8lgqAN5vfp73D6QSTYorQqB4v47aqOVUtysoaURyCY WBep4VgRWYy4vQIDACNAgc9nXVbnERrgBsfPJ2o5GFsNjQWN76wZGmu9pV7e+wdGUi3M k7e5s5pyyGk1FWUsm5MECbTbDgQaa3s7+gPv5JdieBKjWtnXXgrBZY/HG+atoBsAhDrm 8ccJf7RBAxc7SqGbKKYyJF8UbdwN/06BeTKZ/JB3ZKPj0qzM+tV+5rkAt/HZHCLVCneS LJU+CMndrsO+tYF8Siso+lC3e3dHRBmkZQv42Xgb/rmbbhMMGwz5DGVPtBH6uC/cHaOf a4CA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=8Dw7PnH+G2Bh6k4CKjwpqJqAR4B+90JCnNrI22kvuHk=; b=af6oIKHMD+qw/G4OkdYLjeeEiroFB8mE4U3lDMyP3QZLV0mbKv3Wk/423IPx52vlWR 5bfCt4JuXbsaK5ziWLRU5hoU3f8lMbCZfm74EyEVtFzWMWG/dgJtJW+R1JfZql1JsXha 47+YIfUgOz4NVpccaseybyvI7sb1qO5VewP4mZovRbKlZ6zk9pV7r2qP325KgPsK4wEq plcmj9xee3h2/rNokG3sy3gmCbf2qVluiQrXecg19dqtw3++eK+gTr6rf9D1y02kcuZY y0ME/kMk8Fh+xfl06z3Tb5PS5Ol0jzqdmJQFbVSn7jGOOWOH0SbpxvQcB8bdhckS132t iBlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1IAo7RZ5qp1NR9J/KuFjms9kxnX6YOdLs52Cc3OYgOQla52mjr yK4SXDLl7GDDm+U9xoXYNXI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5UNsMufZuKmYD+bEDyW3y2ncpRlaZCUrExfqme5TJXyRQfuutXX6kIfZu0+F/y/395V/glfA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6907:0:b0:22c:b9b7:c96a with SMTP id t7-20020a5d6907000000b0022cb9b7c96amr1957606wru.44.1664276420848; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n188-20020a1ca4c5000000b003a8434530bbsm13256435wme.13.2022.09.27.04.00.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:00:18 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/55] 4.19.260-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220926163538.084331103@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220926163538.084331103@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 06:36:43PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.260 release. > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:35:25 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220925): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1903 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip