From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BD4C04A95 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 10:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233627AbiI1Kqg (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:46:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52068 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231920AbiI1Kqe (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:46:34 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1903ABD43 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 03:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3897D143D; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 03:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.80.218]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F85C3F792; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 03:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:46:25 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Will Deacon , catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 fixes for -rc7 Message-ID: References: <20220923182800.GA14450@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 03:43:05PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 11:28 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > > > Please pull these arm64 fixes for -rc7. They're all very simple and > > self-contained, although the CFI jump-table fix touches the generic > > linker script as that's where the problematic macro lives. > > The commit message is a bit confusing. It talks about "hysterical > raisins on x86", but CONFIG_CFI_CLANG has always been arm64-only. No? > > So I'm not seeing what the x86 comment is about? It was a an accidental inclusion inthe ARM64 CFI series while x86 CFI support was being developed; in the thread in the LINK tage, Sami says: | This was a leftover from an old x86 series, which was included here by | mistake. Will also asked me about this a couple of weeks ago, I think, and | said he'd send a patch to remove it. The relevant message being: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CABCJKufrRCb84fafhsR8_fftBLv0_pvufL_ZZieUSTJfhdT+fw@mail.gmail.com/ Thanks, Mark. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6286DC6FA82 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 10:47:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=FpNoERA8zmLyoTMWfiBgVuH4rvVX8GnD+SXxolG8laM=; b=tPEHp0h0crZiKv pGkda2uTB9KGfAiBmsGKALcWStI9HcATrhdPgFhSK5buoUO/vgQOubsifxsMS4rrL1IJjxptdSinF Mve0z+li7tscKyUbUH/TkHpLvKT1ndMI91DpsdsuxsWg3UpikLuHcNzvfCTORzZNwPqYBW6Zrg3qc YMiamejB/wjWcpV3iKXa4NaABZoVn1rxebXbsNdom6eMU6oTqimPTyqBPKhu+UIQV0WXPOoxIzwTm 6+OD52ooSU0B/wr7GxXxdHQeaisHwBVyslcDtACzLpyms3Usy4mL5MbQMhxXXCF1H7afwXO63sY3M dRe1LYF76PcWpQFtu4Ow==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1odUaM-00Fioy-3p; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 10:46:38 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1odUaI-00Fing-D9 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 10:46:37 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3897D143D; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 03:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.80.218]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F85C3F792; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 03:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:46:25 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Will Deacon , catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 fixes for -rc7 Message-ID: References: <20220923182800.GA14450@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220928_034634_510155_1DFFFD7D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.18 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 03:43:05PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 11:28 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > > > Please pull these arm64 fixes for -rc7. They're all very simple and > > self-contained, although the CFI jump-table fix touches the generic > > linker script as that's where the problematic macro lives. > > The commit message is a bit confusing. It talks about "hysterical > raisins on x86", but CONFIG_CFI_CLANG has always been arm64-only. No? > > So I'm not seeing what the x86 comment is about? It was a an accidental inclusion inthe ARM64 CFI series while x86 CFI support was being developed; in the thread in the LINK tage, Sami says: | This was a leftover from an old x86 series, which was included here by | mistake. Will also asked me about this a couple of weeks ago, I think, and | said he'd send a patch to remove it. The relevant message being: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CABCJKufrRCb84fafhsR8_fftBLv0_pvufL_ZZieUSTJfhdT+fw@mail.gmail.com/ Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel