Re: [PATCH v2] uas: Add US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES for JMicron JMS583Gen 2 - Greg Kroah-Hartman

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Yaroslav Furman <yaro330@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] uas: Add US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES for JMicron JMS583Gen 2
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 07:52:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZA12pMgwA/8CguYd@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230311171226.20353-1-yaro330@gmail.com>

On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 07:12:26PM +0200, Yaroslav Furman wrote:
> Just like other JMicron JMS5xx enclosures, it chokes on report-opcodes,
> let's avoid them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yaroslav Furman <yaro330@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
> index c7b763d6d102..1f8c9b16a0fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,13 @@ UNUSUAL_DEV(0x152d, 0x0578, 0x0000, 0x9999,
>  		USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
>  		US_FL_BROKEN_FUA),
>  
> +/* Reported by: Yaroslav Furman <yaro330@gmail.com> */
> +UNUSUAL_DEV(0x152d, 0x0583, 0x0000, 0x9999,
> +		"JMicron",
> +		"JMS583Gen 2",
> +		USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
> +		US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES),
> +
>  /* Reported-by: Thinh Nguyen <thinhn@synopsys.com> */
>  UNUSUAL_DEV(0x154b, 0xf00b, 0x0000, 0x9999,
>  		"PNY",
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot