From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794DEC64EC4 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229720AbjCIQ5A (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 11:57:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49724 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230444AbjCIQ4a (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 11:56:30 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D6BE3BDA5; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 08:48:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from zn.tnic (p5de8e9fe.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.232.233.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id B22151EC0464; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:48:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1678380525; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=y9fgVkJaonsv4Fq61FCxxoW1/dZqwLtrdhcT+JC/0gI=; b=oLq0+xRxpNxRF+7gFw40PrZBhMfN77YRoJympjw43zS4MFdGKCzTRi2By/ji9HJjNc7h7U O4mLJEfDttVF77nmvJWKyLxI3QXpfxZpZ0BF59AdTDPitGajtBIoCGPq1vS/PbRvDVzRYR muTbKHWIQuzKGhFAr+6/DSiudLrczeE= Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:48:42 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Rick Edgecombe Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H . J . Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , Weijiang Yang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , John Allen , kcc@google.com, eranian@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, dethoma@microsoft.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com, christina.schimpe@intel.com, david@redhat.com, debug@rivosinc.com, Yu-cheng Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 31/41] x86/shstk: Introduce routines modifying shstk Message-ID: References: <20230227222957.24501-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20230227222957.24501-32-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230227222957.24501-32-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 02:29:47PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote: > From: Yu-cheng Yu > > Shadow stacks are normally written to via CALL/RET or specific CET ^ indirectly. > instructions like RSTORSSP/SAVEPREVSSP. However during some Linux > operations the kernel will need to write to directly using the ring-0 only "However, sometimes the kernel will need to..." > WRUSS instruction. > > A shadow stack restore token marks a restore point of the shadow stack, and > the address in a token must point directly above the token, which is within > the same shadow stack. This is distinctively different from other pointers > on the shadow stack, since those pointers point to executable code area. > > Introduce token setup and verify routines. Also introduce WRUSS, which is > a kernel-mode instruction but writes directly to user shadow stack. > > In future patches that enable shadow stack to work with signals, the kernel > will need something to denote the point in the stack where sigreturn may be > called. This will prevent attackers calling sigreturn at arbitrary places > in the stack, in order to help prevent SROP attacks. > > To do this, something that can only be written by the kernel needs to be > placed on the shadow stack. This can be accomplished by setting bit 63 in > the frame written to the shadow stack. Userspace return addresses can't > have this bit set as it is in the kernel range. It is also can't be a s/is // > valid restore token. ... > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h > index de48d1389936..d6cd9344f6c7 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h > @@ -202,6 +202,19 @@ static inline void clwb(volatile void *__p) > : [pax] "a" (p)); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK > +static inline int write_user_shstk_64(u64 __user *addr, u64 val) > +{ > + asm_volatile_goto("1: wrussq %[val], (%[addr])\n" > + _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, %l[fail]) > + :: [addr] "r" (addr), [val] "r" (val) > + :: fail); > + return 0; > +fail: > + return -EFAULT; Nice! > +} > +#endif /* CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK */ > + > #define nop() asm volatile ("nop") > > static inline void serialize(void) ... > +static int put_shstk_data(u64 __user *addr, u64 data) > +{ > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(data & BIT(63))) Dunno, maybe something like: /* * A comment explaining what that is... */ #define SHSTK_SIGRETURN_TOKEN BIT_ULL(63) or so? And use that instead of that magical bit 63. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette