From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D945C64EC4 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230405AbjCJIKw (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 03:10:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55200 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230197AbjCJIKe (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 03:10:34 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AD3B61AB4; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 00:09:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=mpITJ4Nl7x5vVIbFIcOw20XFdkPGouMW+7WyYlYEXIE=; b=iY+rchdoXBw/mcd+sv6Tdc/2vw l0y0tl65oL4OhOozZ02UQMIORVSI5OYsywa1qZm8dsB4MD7alS6B7zWn5n5IL4u487/aMaRIZbEKh bF9aQdEDZ93NOMpDixImOcQXI/1ONc5wQrNL0vEMIPqD1zV/4B5qlh0uJtEHcN8vNgVtjkocsKsAr tlYkKAwCP+16zo9Ps5VXsZA8EYa12jFiaiT/zaUdX5t8I+dmJ+17el+RWjfzyHlbUG86O5lAV7Vdi iX9q3xQVgYfuDIDXt3orN7EgVlqaTVCxEORtkNsXOw+jsAK+aNMA+ee7yFChty90+R23nOeVnXfq6 z687JK2Q==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1paXot-00DYSu-HZ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:09:43 +0000 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 00:09:43 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: John Moon Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Nicolas Schier , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Randy Dunlap , Arnd Bergmann , Bjorn Andersson , Todd Kjos , Matthias Maennich , Giuliano Procida , kernel-team@android.com, libabigail@sourceware.org, Jordan Crouse , Trilok Soni , Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala , Elliot Berman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Validating UAPI backwards compatibility Message-ID: References: <20230301075402.4578-1-quic_johmoo@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230301075402.4578-1-quic_johmoo@quicinc.com> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:54:00PM -0800, John Moon wrote: > Our goal is to add tooling for vendor driver developers because the > upstream model of expert maintainer code review can be difficult to > replicate in-house. Tools may help developers catch simple UAPI > incompatibilities that could be easily overlooked by in-house review. Why would this matter in any way for the kernel? If you tool is useful for in-kernel usage it should be added to the tree and documented as such, but ouf of tree crap simply does not matter. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4927FC6FD1C for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:10:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=+8cks/lmlOmHqZ9yYUW6hrAnZt/MH6877WLMTzEhgv8=; b=Fd9KRmOE0W3njH Q1y2BzasItgS55HrNhGcenamCXP4Qnb92wyavG7/oQqJ+ma7FRwRdo6LpkT4FAmZRusF4kMM5lzWZ HUXUamorzhYt5qYmQYwrac7Wzbfhhc0DmLwqG6hQg2Lksa7pi6FEpiFPZW/zZ5IGeKzObZPW2/eRt bqeI40l5gWE03KoBkjlJhs9NfBTkx/DVPQLN3kLJx+JEngIi6ZX8rF97EXcldhet6mAJmmD83Ajpu vNCHuGdz67z9xs/jjw1uljSi/GUbd9OW5fwVFoiVWlh8Wo9COOqxd/iBUHgy5NJ0m0s7IuUjseOe3 DwUiijLmb6D/upU9GFxQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1paXp2-00DYW7-LG; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:09:53 +0000 Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1paXot-00DYSu-HZ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:09:43 +0000 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 00:09:43 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: John Moon Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Nicolas Schier , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Randy Dunlap , Arnd Bergmann , Bjorn Andersson , Todd Kjos , Matthias Maennich , Giuliano Procida , kernel-team@android.com, libabigail@sourceware.org, Jordan Crouse , Trilok Soni , Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala , Elliot Berman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Validating UAPI backwards compatibility Message-ID: References: <20230301075402.4578-1-quic_johmoo@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230301075402.4578-1-quic_johmoo@quicinc.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:54:00PM -0800, John Moon wrote: > Our goal is to add tooling for vendor driver developers because the > upstream model of expert maintainer code review can be difficult to > replicate in-house. Tools may help developers catch simple UAPI > incompatibilities that could be easily overlooked by in-house review. Why would this matter in any way for the kernel? If you tool is useful for in-kernel usage it should be added to the tree and documented as such, but ouf of tree crap simply does not matter. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel