From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C78EB3C30; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35351C433EF; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:39:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1678811950; bh=Vx7uM9fWMCpVMGWtFNryGdXdw31PgaYm7KlFHOU1CLw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NdEhbzs1kV/dXeAH8MDyev+OO5WZj8wqk/IU/cHy/kb7/5PhKl82ojWqOJtxBbPzf qsdLG7edz5/l9Z/ydeC8zhY/pxepnTtXd51i70E6sJmOGKd4DCmefjEIqX+939fh2s lBvgzLrmwLgNamx2QWQndUS0OgQLNKru5TfXyExY= Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:39:07 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Alison Schofield Cc: Philipp Hortmann , Kloudifold , teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, outreachy@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: sm750: Rename function to avoid CamelCase Message-ID: References: <64f9d3ca-268e-71ae-4a6d-b71315a8406e@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 09:04:53AM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 01:07:59AM +0100, Philipp Hortmann wrote: > > On 3/13/23 21:43, Kloudifold wrote: > > > The sm750 driver had some functions named in CamelCase, > > > which violates the kernel's naming convention. > > > In this patch, I rename these functions to snake case, > > > which is the expected style. > > > > Hi, > > please make the Subject more unique. Many patches could have this name. > > Look for examples in: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/ > > > > Please use your full name consisting of a given name and a family name in > > front of your email. Or is this not possible and "Kloudifold" is both? > > Kloudifold, > > It'll probably take a bit for the change, allowing pseudonyms, to become > common knowledge. When the question comes up, you can just point to the > latest update to Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst as I've > done below. > > Phillip, > I commented similar to you, and then discovered this: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d4563201f33a022fc0353033d9dfeb1606a88330 > > Pseudonyms now allowed. "Known pseudonyms" are now allowed. So that means that somehow I need to "know" this is actually a pseudonym and that it is unique and so on. As you are dealing with outreachy already, odds are you have to use a non-pseudonym for them in order to track patches and payments and the like, so please use the identifier you use with outreachy. thanks, greg k-h