From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f179.google.com (mail-pf1-f179.google.com [209.85.210.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27D4E19E79 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f179.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-653436fcc1bso3565481b3a.2 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 07:07:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686578858; x=1689170858; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B+7S35QW+acZtg4WWUpYFQktRq0VTaZ64Z9p3u7NETI=; b=qSQK6e/WaMB/Xqatfc63tiEPAzFpdUezm2kefEGgJwx/0LiPniP7wob/B/ICrs1mcg l4kKjwnwv1f/Uef9MAbTklNCB7Rj+x8r7ZRMogEg0iQ0JlENJjOqVKpFUcPqoPRxQhMw n+uaMV+pRX3jo+mGEdIkfx1V18BN1A8hJkfMK3IB4n49ASr43nFsqOeqq/GyC1czPMxa ulF4Y2T/iposudnh6/ovz6HlvzB1cKDXESTNHhbqADKwhiR+RI9VdEhxLV2SBMuw0Xui MSOnpxwv2d8papuYkQXRwR6jNwL+6gQT+7q3m5QHOsGcD4YiHIy02WQ0A/F8lLkW0L0q BxVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686578858; x=1689170858; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=B+7S35QW+acZtg4WWUpYFQktRq0VTaZ64Z9p3u7NETI=; b=WTe5SUqfLpE6jzpOEd3XoEP9OoQTASKkEsvhkOn2yGn5Hn+BZjXS8T2mlo9gkqozPU pB9aZj/TIQGCKgR+tMFgVbqsREfWEQ5Z2C0nuVFf7SLX6lLRi9WczfIGNfkuuv+SKkOd Ml4uBNtw/LHODOJL9Ed1PJ+jdftt0fgI6gBbqL/A6o6lgkA8fJepLKAJwI6MEIDCrtRG 0d8vTv125AlBpKmfkAUImBbfr+YiaZWituLkTCSQX87y8PhXiDAgL2sXXqzKfSzuCRqR zm98FWdD+n7xXvfQILrhNP3dbqJeFbP+QqXgTjA4SK8B+qmFVYv1FumnSPFh33kuQcb+ fZ/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxoCTwGE+5JhriMcXK7B90eVfIYP2E7twSvMViH80L8pX5KNxGV ngMymDm/5LAfbwSZgSpQGuE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5upXhNnZ0xatFLuC9i6LDRa9OLgeV+Y3qmM3xfBGZkBs9NfQfUKOgKSXrmA8KEYZCpdp5BPw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:180e:b0:659:ae1c:c9e2 with SMTP id y14-20020a056a00180e00b00659ae1cc9e2mr11595513pfa.17.1686578858208; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 07:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.me (subs02-180-214-232-21.three.co.id. [180.214.232.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e15-20020aa7824f000000b0066355064acbsm6914328pfn.104.2023.06.12.07.07.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 07:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by debian.me (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2ADC5106C19; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:07:34 +0700 (WIB) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:07:33 +0700 From: Bagas Sanjaya To: Sami Korkalainen , Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Stable , Linux Regressions , Linux Networking , Linux ACPI , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Boot stall from merge tag 'net-next-6.2' Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tWIpDNZqlXgx17RH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --tWIpDNZqlXgx17RH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 04:07:56AM +0000, Sami Korkalainen wrote: > >Where is SCSI info? >=20 > Right there, under the text (It was so short, that I thought to put it in= the message. Maybe I should have put that also in pastebin for consistency= and clarity): >=20 > Attached devices: > Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 > Vendor: ATA Model: KINGSTON SVP200S Rev: C4 > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 > Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 > Vendor: hp Model: CDDVDW TS-L633M Rev: 0301 > Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 05 >=20 > >I think networking changes shouldn't cause this ACPI regression, right? > Yeah, beats me, but that's what I got by bisecting. My expertise ends abo= ut here. Hmm, no reply for a while. Networking people: It looks like your v6.2 PR introduces unrelated ACPICA regression. Can you explain why? ACPICA people: Can you figure out why do this regression happen? Sami: Can you try latest mainline and repeat bisection as confirmation? I'm considering to remove this from regression tracking if there is no replies in several more days. Thanks. --=20 An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara --tWIpDNZqlXgx17RH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCZIcmoQAKCRD2uYlJVVFO o0wKAQCcH1j4r5tTFN68Co51J4YMdY4PIF5cCpAk35SIIZX4IQEA07PBQBFcbwxR k4AfJYj4bdOcl372Mr+/9vr6aGcgFgc= =p0sj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tWIpDNZqlXgx17RH--