All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Enable x2apic during resume from suspend if used previously
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:36:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTeB9K4NYu1sRiZ1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231023160018.164054-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com>


* Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> wrote:

> If x2apic was enabled during boot with parallel startup
> it will be needed during resume from suspend to ram as well.
> 
> Store whether to enable into the smpboot_control global variable
> and during startup re-enable it if necessary.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
> Fixes: 0c7ffa32dbd6 ("x86/smpboot/64: Implement arch_cpuhp_init_parallel_bringup() and enable it")
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h   |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S    | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
> index c31c633419fe..86584ffaebc3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ extern unsigned long apic_mmio_base;
>  #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>  
>  /* Control bits for startup_64 */
> +#define STARTUP_ENABLE_X2APIC	0x40000000
>  #define STARTUP_READ_APICID	0x80000000
>  
>  /* Top 8 bits are reserved for control */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
> index 6dfecb27b846..29734a1299f6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dmi.h>
>  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>  #include <linux/pgtable.h>
> +#include <asm/apic.h>
>  #include <asm/segment.h>
>  #include <asm/desc.h>
>  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> @@ -129,11 +130,14 @@ int x86_acpi_suspend_lowlevel(void)
>  	 */
>  	current->thread.sp = (unsigned long)temp_stack + sizeof(temp_stack);
>  	/*
> -	 * Ensure the CPU knows which one it is when it comes back, if
> -	 * it isn't in parallel mode and expected to work that out for
> -	 * itself.
> +	 * Ensure x2apic is re-enabled if necessary and the CPU knows which
> +	 * one it is when it comes back, if it isn't in parallel mode and
> +	 * expected to work that out for itself.
>  	 */
> -	if (!(smpboot_control & STARTUP_PARALLEL_MASK))
> +	if (smpboot_control & STARTUP_PARALLEL_MASK) {
> +		if (x2apic_enabled())
> +			smpboot_control |= STARTUP_ENABLE_X2APIC;
> +	} else
>  		smpboot_control = smp_processor_id();

Yeah, so instead of adding further kludges to the 'parallel bringup is 
possible' code path, which is arguably a functional feature that shouldn't 
have hardware-management coupled to it, would it be possible to fix 
parallel bringup to AMD-SEV systems, so that this code path isn't a 
quirk-dependent "parallel boot" codepath, but simply the "x86 SMP boot 
codepath", where all SMP x86 systems do a parallel bootup?

The original commit by Thomas says:

  0c7ffa32dbd6 ("x86/smpboot/64: Implement arch_cpuhp_init_parallel_bringup() and enable it")

  | Unfortunately there is no RDMSR GHCB protocol at the moment, so enabling 
  | AMD-SEV guests for parallel startup needs some more thought.

But that was half a year ago, isn't there RDMSR GHCB access code available now?

This code would all read a lot more natural if it was the regular x86 SMP 
bootup path - which it is 'almost' today already, modulo quirk.

Obviously coupling functional features with hardware quirks is fragile, for 
example your patch extending x86 SMP parallel bringup doesn't extend the 
AMD-SEV case, which may or may not matter in practice.

So, if it's possible, it would be nice to fix AMD-SEV systems as well and 
remove this artificial coupling.

Also, side note #1: curly braces should be balanced.

>  #endif
>  	initial_code = (unsigned long)wakeup_long64;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> index ea6995920b7a..fcfa79105928 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> @@ -236,10 +236,15 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(secondary_startup_64_no_verify, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>  	 * used to look up the CPU number.  For booting a single CPU, the
>  	 * CPU number is encoded in smpboot_control.
>  	 *
> +	 * Bit 30	STARTUP_ENABLE_X2APIC (Enable X2APIC mode)
>  	 * Bit 31	STARTUP_READ_APICID (Read APICID from APIC)
>  	 * Bit 0-23	CPU# if STARTUP_xx flags are not set

Side note #2: you mixed up the comment ordering here.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-24  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-23 16:00 [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for s3 with parallel bootup Mario Limonciello
2023-10-23 16:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Enable x2apic during resume from suspend if used previously Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24  8:36   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2023-10-24 15:36     ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 17:01       ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-25 19:04         ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 17:30       ` Tom Lendacky
2023-10-23 16:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/amd: Don't allow pre-emption in amd_pmu_lbr_reset() Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24  8:02   ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-24 15:32     ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 15:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-24 16:04         ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 16:30           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-24 16:34             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-25 11:47               ` Sandipan Das
2023-10-24 16:51     ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-24 18:30       ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-24 22:24         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZTeB9K4NYu1sRiZ1@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.