From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C78C438DD9 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 14:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="aFCACBXf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1703081206; x=1734617206; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=FXt9o85Q7uEvTfQ1NLI9yeZgFO9/slgh99dOMa+Vk+I=; b=aFCACBXfg9xJLNEaOnUveZIDZXztzrswKq89PCGZEUDixp41SGMAfM5n Srfp9JtTJC/4z2cxuiqBcee/URQ+3YS/D4Fdgom1YixEIXgnEPuc0srOT asmCwR7UfpFXGRRqDg4GofMLkeMaSoyTlPp9QMczZ5oSJ740C3721FuXC 5WNxK5u5pX49+Unxshtk5aXmeCDKeoNqwHjBsYsVOaYO9F2yuvFXkRZ8F uYT0ChIMn4uGJ/VRJNILTcg1Sd0KOFnl1W6sRT7Y3dwnUfOw+yPO3rQt0 kFpkStiMom3iN9vyoWlIydmSfUQUgnczFhzjq+oPsod3radHFOCBGQNMu w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10930"; a="2657452" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,291,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="2657452" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2023 06:06:41 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10930"; a="779862550" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,291,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="779862550" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2023 06:06:38 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rFxDX-00000007YN2-2Dr8; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:06:35 +0200 Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:06:35 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Yury Norov , Marc Zyngier , Peter Zijlstra , Rasmus Villemoes Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] genirq/irq_sim: misc updates Message-ID: References: <20231115165915.2936349-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 09:17:38PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:14 AM Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 9:47 AM Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:18 AM Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:59 PM Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: ... > > > > It's been two weeks since this submission and ~2.5 months since the > > > > first one so I guess, a gentle ping is in order. This is not a very > > > > controversial series - can this be applied? > > > > > > Another ping... > > > > Is there any formal reason why this cannot be processed? > > Ping. Instead you can now just say that you are going to apply this via your tree, if there won't be objections, e.g., within a week (or two as it's a holiday season). In the PR to Linus you can explain why it's taken like this. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko