On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 04:52:42PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 02:40:21PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 12.03.2024 17:25, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > > It will be useful for error reporting in a subsequent patch.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
> > 
> > In principle
> > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> > However, ...
> > 
> > > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> > > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> > > @@ -682,6 +682,7 @@ struct extra_reserved_range {
> > >      unsigned long start;
> > >      unsigned long nr;
> > >      pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
> > > +    const char *name;
> > >  };
> > 
> > ... to me "descr" (or the longer "description") would seem more suitable.
> > Thoughts?
> 
> I'm happy either way, but I don't find 'name' odd.

"descr" sounds a bit weird (even though it's clear what it means),
"name" is a full word. And also, quick grep suggest other places use
"name" for similar purpose (I haven't found a single "descr" nor
"description" struct field).

-- 
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab