From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 528E017758; Fri, 3 May 2024 10:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714733863; cv=none; b=KiQq8WnzIiElHdgyjdiw0ZNryP67z8tfvk3uMjUQs//nZRj9gbbTHJPe5LusFUaNNHuKRWV5hIeA8VKq7TuxlrrXRY6S69GcGsjkvxRAkK7kmmbhWVKlzpga9rS+OyREwSguPn8cvsTaN65H9biYbwHGpZMNQrVmYLYCUKn4jV0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714733863; c=relaxed/simple; bh=P5CKWZ2xCu+HyLA9GJYxKRvnqvJqVTPDARsJ0/n8HOk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fJoHN8URsQDZrs5KiHEkbeHUwqZ2kNC2pfbrR7oNH0Rm8hIgGmymvKiaV/5Fhcq/w7Ul3+cpX0hfpVIItrqSqgZKIsU4pPn3G9F/TZmNaXXD6eblBogjJYTaMk0mnm6iX9jml/YEfJPEN5iFMlJigT+AoQkZGtaa7voHobkrsE8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tacbuA+V; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tacbuA+V" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3443C116B1; Fri, 3 May 2024 10:57:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1714733862; bh=P5CKWZ2xCu+HyLA9GJYxKRvnqvJqVTPDARsJ0/n8HOk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tacbuA+VyWNAhuawI+diZSSbU8d/A0IAarPODCRabmX+qWRJNz4ZoV6MkwWZqez73 yoXbOqWyx0/xZxtWpOSyiCe7oNP33ufjaM5oEj1pOatce71qXAyxm5wHRGJ6uWe2II 59oCR3/Cz5KQur9BeWfk9kMk3/7xLTJ+hk8PDcRqMQ93idmy8bMd59YCtQdXTCqC9B twWS1Q6ZQ/KnL5PBd/guYHPgsNAdNPOXRzKm3qEvmIMeNnv9amxcrOfr4NTXm83ZVM jM06SnQmSeb9J4eBWm44ykxgNIQ+3VKHVlL5qdfFLU04vgmbF5h/xADy0JRZRFphAt 8bZn+QK8jNIYA== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1s2qbo-000000006NE-0kC8; Fri, 03 May 2024 12:57:44 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 12:57:44 +0200 From: Johan Hovold To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/52] USB: store owner from modules with usb_serial_register_drivers() Message-ID: References: <20240328-module-owner-usb-serial-v1-0-bc46c9ffbf56@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 11:49:53AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 15/04/2024 10:54, Johan Hovold wrote: > > No, sending 51 trivial one-line cleanup patches like this is not > > acceptable. > > > > This is just one logical change so squash them all into one patch for > > the entire subsystem (i.e. this series should contain two patches). > > Sure. This is not exactly one logical change, but two, because the first > patch might fix some drivers which forgot to set the owner (even if I > did not identify them). Sorry if this wasn't clear enough, but I was referring to the last 51 one-line patches being one logical change (and hence the series should contain two patches as I mentioned). Johan