From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: j.naumann@fu-berlin.de (Jan Luca Naumann) Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 12:23:16 +0200 Subject: Problem with new uapi header in Linux kernel 4.4+ In-Reply-To: <20161007143101.GA5899@sbauer-Z170X-UD5> References: <37b9f516-a945-d41f-b21a-48728d7f9680@fu-berlin.de> <20161007073111.GB1936@infradead.org> <20161007143101.GA5899@sbauer-Z170X-UD5> Message-ID: Hey, this sound very nice :-) OPAL supported directly by the kernel would be very good. Thank you and best regards, Jan Am 07.10.2016 um 16:31 schrieb Scott Bauer: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016@12:31:11AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Hi Scott, >> >>> For what it is worth the kernel will soon have OPAL support built in >>> so you won't have to do this weird hack, and use a tool that is no >>> longer maintained. >> >> What's the ETA for OPAL support? We had a patch from Intel for it >> half a year ago, but the submitter didn't follow up on the review >> feedback. (Same for the simple ATA security unlock scheme submitted >> by someone else). > > I or Rafael will send a series sometime next week or early the week after... > assuming some final testing all goes to plan. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: