On 05/29/2017 10:40 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:

> In-Reply-To: <20170509173559.31598-4-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> 	(=?utf-8?Q?=22Marc-Andr=C3=A9?=
> 	Lureau"'s message of "Tue, 9 May 2017 20:35:45 +0300")
> 

>> in-reply-to     =       "In-Reply-To:" 1*msg-id CRLF
>>

msg-id          =       [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS]

then looking at 3.2.3 on folding white space and comments:

CFWS            =       *([FWS] comment) (([FWS] comment) / FWS)

comment         =       "(" *([FWS] ccontent) [FWS] ")"

> I can imagine if consider CFWS, patchew should probably just work (I can fix
> that), but it's still good to understand this.

So yes, I think the comment is valid per the grammar, and patchew should
be taught to recognize it.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org