From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6aXD-0007kx-Ik for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 05:00:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6aX7-0008T7-S7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 05:00:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]:33001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6aX7-0008Qb-M0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 05:00:05 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id u144so23934789wmu.0 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:00:05 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1477850917-1214-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1477850917-1214-13-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <925e80d1-f936-4519-9490-9c40d129392e@de.ibm.com> <75f9936a-443a-79ee-8e44-ff4b93ab66bc@redhat.com> <995f9b5c-abc0-927c-f164-c815a1f8b038@de.ibm.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:00:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <995f9b5c-abc0-927c-f164-c815a1f8b038@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 12/47] virtio: remove ioeventfd_disabled altogether List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christian Borntraeger , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Cornelia Huck , Peter Maydell , Farhan Ali On 15/11/2016 09:27, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > hmm, not quite. > This patch on top of > commit 6bbcb76301a72dc80c8d29af13d40bb9a759c9c6 MAINTAINERS: Remove obsolete stable branches > still triggers > > qemu-system-s390x: hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c:1076: virtio_ccw_remove_irqfd: Assertion `ret == 0' failed. > for some cases according to Farhan. > > There are too many patches floating around, what is the latest assumed to be > final patch set? We can then test that. I'm sending it as soon as I finish testing. But for s390 it should be just one patch, the rest only affects PCI and MMIO (and it had been broken forever for dataplane, so the refactoring did its job by exposing everyone to dataplane bugs, and even before the release :)). Paolo