From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1blp0190.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.190]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE702E00480 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BY2PR03MB379.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.237.21) by BY2PR03MB380.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.237.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.921.12; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:59:47 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB379.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.237.21]) by BY2PR03MB379.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.237.21]) with mapi id 15.00.0921.000; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:59:47 +0000 From: "Daiane.Angolini@freescale.com" To: Alexandre Belloni Thread-Topic: [meta-freescale] [ANN] FSL Test Plan Announcement 1.6 Thread-Index: AQHPUC7NJ494bnClG0yqhgzIfVYJ15sCERUAgAQgPRCAD8VrAIAIYIUAgAATo9A= Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:59:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <653c8aa7b3e04f11931a3f1bb2c21f0a@BY2PR03MB379.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20140404225342.GJ4883@piout.net> <20140417144436.GM2813@piout.net> <20140422224007.GQ3461@piout.net> In-Reply-To: <20140422224007.GQ3461@piout.net> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [201.74.242.36] x-forefront-prvs: 01894AD3B8 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(428001)(199002)(189002)(479174003)(13464003)(51704005)(377454003)(76576001)(54356999)(99396002)(77096999)(76482001)(80976001)(50986999)(76176999)(46102001)(86362001)(15975445006)(4396001)(74316001)(83072002)(99286001)(19580405001)(83322001)(85852003)(19580395003)(80022001)(33646001)(79102001)(2656002)(92566001)(66066001)(15202345003)(16601075003)(87936001)(74662001)(81342001)(81542001)(20776003)(74502001)(31966008)(77982001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB380; H:BY2PR03MB379.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:ACFCD096.AEE6D40E.B1F9BDAB.4AE8E069.204BD; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (: freescale.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [ANN] FSL Test Plan Announcement 1.6 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:59:54 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandre Belloni [mailto:alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 7:40 PM > To: Angolini Daiane-B19406 > Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [ANN] FSL Test Plan Announcement 1.6 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > One last thing to add to the test plan would be ethernet connectivity as = a > lot of the boards have that available. I=B4ve been thinking about it, as well. Today I completed several tests and= it looks like it does not make any sense to repeat aplay or evetest test o= ver and over in the same kernel (2.6.35 for imx53qsb, i.e.) But, in other hand, these silly tests make sure we have a good kernel integ= ration. Other feedback I received from Fabio: - Does audio capture work? - Does HDMI audio playback work? - Does SPDIF audio playback work? - Does USB host work? - Does USB gadget work? (g_ether for example) - Does suspend/resume work? - Does SATA work? - Does Wifi work? To be added as test for 1.7 >=20 > I finished to filled for all the cfa boards today but I'll send a patch t= o > tweak the kernel configuration so that they behave a bit better (mainly > removing a lot of debug and better handling of the USB phy) Sweet! (I always realize something to be changed during the test cycle.) So far we have 18 responses, for 11 MACHINEs ( 7 MACHINEs are from Alexandr= e) Daiane >=20 > On 17/04/2014 at 16:44:36 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote : > > On 07/04/2014 at 14:19:00 +0000, Daiane.Angolini@freescale.com wrote : > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Alexandre Belloni > > > > [mailto:alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com] > > > > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 7:54 PM > > > > To: Angolini Daiane-B19406 > > > > Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > > > > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [ANN] FSL Test Plan Announcement 1.6 > > > > > > > > Hi Daiane, > > > > > > > > On 04/04/2014 at 17:57:26 +0000, Daiane.Angolini@freescale.com wrot= e > : > > > > > The goal test plan for this release is: > > > > > > > > > > MUST HAVE: > > > > > * all 29 boards MUST reach the user space prompt > > > > > * all i.MX6 boards MUST have running accelerated > > > > > * x11 > > > > > * framebuffer > > > > > * wayland > > > > > * directfb > > > > > * all i.MX6 boards MUST have GPU and VPU support for both SFP > > > > > and HFP > > > > > * all 29 boards MUST play at least one movie > > > > > > > > I'm not sure it is worth playing movie on the few boards that > > > > don't have a screen ;) > > > > > > Humm, It=B4s something that I=B4m always /not absolutely sure/. > > > > > > But, why would a board with a multimemdia chip not play a movie of ha= ve > a "screen" > > > > > > In our current board list, only vybrid is not supposed to be > "multimedia chip" > > > > > > And, wandboard, for example, does not have an screen until you plug > HDMI. > > > > > > And don=B4t forget imx28/imx233, the chip does not have VPU, but I al= ways > work to get playback working on it. > > > > > > So, I=B4m think say /all boards must play at least one movie/ is not = that > wrong. But of course I can add "when applicable" > > > > > > > Yeah, I would add when applicable and I would add a "not applicable" > > choice in the Multimedia sections. The cfa10036 and cfa10037 don"t > > have any video output of any kind LCD, VGA, HDMI... > > > > > > > > > > > * all 29 boards MUST encode at least one kind of movie > > > > > > > > Same here, I don't have any board able to capture video... > > > > I don't have any audio out either. > > > > > > Here I agree that this should be SHOULD not MUST. Or add a "when > applicable". > > > > > > In your opinion, what would be a better Test Goals? Would you mind to > re-write mine and to share it? > > > > > > > I think the tests goals are fine as these allow to test the > > integration of all the software stack. It is just that some > > crystalfontz boards are not designed for multimedia so I can't test aud= io > and/or video. > > > > > > -- > > Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons > > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > > http://free-electrons.com > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > meta-freescale mailing list > > meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale >=20 > -- > Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com >=20