From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon South Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:43:35 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] ROCK64 fails to boot using U-Boot TPL In-Reply-To: References: <528ca18f-f707-b63e-0934-7c830f4d7484@simonsouth.net> <9a8e2bd6-49e5-e0ac-c711-b0f5ec7d3115@simonsouth.net> <706e6377-b261-9a76-fa33-180658a9655e@simonsouth.net> <20190920101429.GD29180@mail.duskware.de> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 2019-09-20 1:37 p.m., Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > What is the difference? In filesize? The EFI bootloader: 205136 bootaa64.efi The DTB file: 53513 rk3328-rock64.dtb It's about one quarter the size. It is strange the EFI bootloader and the kernel both seem always to load reliably when the DTB file doesn't. ---------- => ls mmc 1 /EFI/BOOT/ ./ ../ 205136 bootaa64.efi 1 file(s), 2 dir(s) => ls mmc 1 /dtb/rockchip/ ./ ../ 77017 rk3399-sapphire.dtb 81304 rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dtb 78646 rk3399-rockpro64.dtb 77846 rk3399-rock960.dtb 76155 rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtb 77701 rk3399-roc-pc.dtb 78035 rk3399-puma-haikou.dtb 78483 rk3399-nanopi-m4.dtb 78791 rk3399-nanopc-t4.dtb 86532 rk3399-gru-scarlet-kd.dtb 86507 rk3399-gru-scarlet-inx.dtb 89522 rk3399-gru-kevin.dtb 85495 rk3399-gru-bob.dtb 80312 rk3399-firefly.dtb 78519 rk3399-ficus.dtb 68842 rk3399-evb.dtb 53513 rk3328-rock64.dtb 52150 rk3328-roc-cc.dtb 51134 rk3328-evb.dtb 19 file(s), 2 dir(s) => -- Simon South simon at simonsouth.net