From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750801AbdAWJsz (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 04:48:55 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:63331 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750707AbdAWJsx (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 04:48:53 -0500 Subject: Re: KVM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations To: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org References: <5e40aa05-ccdf-0995-e1c4-a331d1da998a@redhat.com> Cc: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:48:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5e40aa05-ccdf-0995-e1c4-a331d1da998a@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3MbJV0PeIIwlmZ+YT7/Qg7xq0UYNQl+ak9+znPVFRqxhXJPNYrT EQ/KYkQwKlpstnPhHo5V1sWT8tJnNjhpegWrLneVCwu46XcAbY44EbXPI//MUhx+KDhW0m/ Txe36vyCb1NY4bnLat0FBqQOpHzCl5zy8kP80qFlj3h8zRTzPA0RUpPu+np/YutUVtOhpFQ oc4rgHT1kYVOGtGWh62sA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ADSS5AudTXw=:MYd6urR6VnhKaeGXFxDUMY wprjYvu3FbeNEFMN8j5vcobsiedGGvOifaWbElyuNYBWxklyBaj1u3XNZdW5QdLtUN45Y9Lng zderCqlUWxOAP3dDtsEPeUyDOhmgi6RMWZtKG6ztJHYqNNT/pPYX1pRTx7+NLk8d57Y8T9zGH Ajgqy+MErYO2us/bAS6mtDSgOF4YCtsHVnzv1m5aP/Cnp5aMydg992IifPIfxVF33tjq7Wf0W 8GgFVNIXdsYZ2Gguiv09mkmys37CybKEpb3Mvs5XXAqFbNUfyXTB42va+OnXYm7SMooEIRqWX A2BX7cK9YXoJIFJnp43ROhV2O7kASIIYCFHtaSgp4aX/EC4c0779fYJdQP2/w9nGCuzSEG6rw m2atZr2nO+I2vbjEp50w7FaFBHbq1UFH1oEKn9uijJ+zh8kTQflnAvneiECjrVwb9rk+xDdL5 cOTnNQ/VNx44ZsStBgo2fR8uz/41h9gFR0jeIkCkwRkuY7uuQGphd1RBUH3ZacaDPl6L+Y2nq yff3ZTrcjy9nS1xGUZc/xasaATkoSEPjLJplli2ihEywen5T9I2y0rmJBTX953nCji94qWnuN KuT3VxlYUKrSN3c4I10czaOWkYVKYEQSk5PT2Zi2E4TKGAJdzDTuksNPQ1e/pQzvOZUJbj1l0 IBfYKTAXIUBcqqqizdoVjqrWI78BmyyxkzYbEBgwjQ4nRJ2zmhZ9++dRxVqbUdl7nBMZB/JPK Y4o5EzojUkhJOTqiTDnerjcpNbm/GHaKSKGpOscvGOrvlHIHei4ac4gi2vQTaYLtCn7QCy4RI K+sK7Ra Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Patches 1, 6 and 7 are acceptable. Thanks for a bit of positive feedback. > The others are useless churn or they make the result uselessly different > from the rest of KVM code. I got an other view about potential benefits around the suggested movements for error code settings. Would others like to help in approaches for checking corresponding run time changes a bit more? Regards, Markus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 09:48:15 +0000 Subject: Re: KVM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Message-Id: List-Id: References: <5e40aa05-ccdf-0995-e1c4-a331d1da998a@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5e40aa05-ccdf-0995-e1c4-a331d1da998a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org > Patches 1, 6 and 7 are acceptable. Thanks for a bit of positive feedback. > The others are useless churn or they make the result uselessly different > from the rest of KVM code. I got an other view about potential benefits around the suggested movements for error code settings. Would others like to help in approaches for checking corresponding run time changes a bit more? Regards, Markus