From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2665EC43387 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE9720859 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="d10bWCYn" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731356AbfAOQHL (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:07:11 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:32821 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727452AbfAOQHL (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:07:11 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id l11so3567968qtp.0 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:07:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wPnW6q/HHKkcOHGM/6QHxC4CsD+nAJHzVQGj8iXJSJ8=; b=d10bWCYnAnWekMc0ihNq7pBTSwNvUOl5Vqo7Fdfa0jFclZpVSaxcknWuN3ETqf7VHY 3xT06F/ReRlPTydWRdvdOPdc6piPOOZ2rLtYWNt0/WK9ZmNa1BuFqFdDxg2ek1dRLGKx lFtVAED/D08RynpRTLLMncqJiM2Nkq8kuXlmU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wPnW6q/HHKkcOHGM/6QHxC4CsD+nAJHzVQGj8iXJSJ8=; b=FrhXPrPAXo1bFJbXA7v8J3xxv9dUGS64zpyFvfjTU+GI87x5DVr4nE+6I9ERW328cT C70EzS1uP1W3IdfIfA0F02kkR56B7GtLg4WpLSZ0hCyw7C4OMQdw+6eHFlNhqcXZADP9 qB1+poVeGU2BcppF0sY+kTqdzhGAR8cmaiO6IRO7AHYMLzrqB6ZxQXjqdv0DbkNjZL3I XyA0WHfBbKVk+ee7KeFjIW87iEBYkuBkiqVJayCz0rekaadNHemvWIi9si8zrtWvPkGh YpMfizf6S3P/FFDEjh+af+8pB9xKyEOoAgC4XJCsydeLpaDrOxWzis96eE7VNhK5OuQ5 dPwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfL9ScXLdwfncgMaVC4e78BbANK8mmAP//qpwbqbpHQHfy7cUXC k3JUq7H254ktdMfecQ0l/m+qlw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5HP7jHrgvgvjSk/xFaZWKSO6fGExMDrfsqY2Zol9rgoGKMA/KOMgl/i3rLluUtumFNkREjWw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f8cb:: with SMTP id h11mr3540901qvo.134.1547568430298; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (pool-72-71-243-63.cncdnh.fast00.myfairpoint.net. [72.71.243.63]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p14sm20907264qkl.18.2019.01.15.08.07.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:07:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/17] V4.14 backport of more 32-bit arm spectre patches To: Greg KH Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , Florian Fainelli , Julien Thierry , Tony Lindgren , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Mark Brown References: <20190110175150.5239-1-dave.long@linaro.org> <20190115154547.GA29144@kroah.com> From: David Long Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:07:08 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190115154547.GA29144@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On 1/15/19 10:45 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:51:33PM -0500, David Long wrote: >> From: "David A. Long" >> >> V4.14 backport of spectre patches from Russell M. King's spectre branch. > > If I take these, than 4.19 is vulnerable. So someone upgrading from > 4.14 to 4.19 will regress :( > > Can you please send me a 4.19 series so I can apply that before this > one? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > OK, didn't think about that being a problem. Working on it. Pretty sure there's exactly one patch needed for that. -dl