From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968F7C433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F1664FBC for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:14:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D8F1664FBC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3254068C; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:14:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F48140687 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:14:00 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: R9s1RnlosRZm/XtvWdfyUUMz33KhcQEu+6c2su2bmu6qz3xlsuajLmuoFwYOvE04hdtaa70rL4 a5pXStzYh8Jw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9917"; a="186081522" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,237,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="186081522" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Mar 2021 05:13:59 -0800 IronPort-SDR: mbYjKZ5JLDQ04n6Hea8LMMDe5qb5YYVhCGy6cYAyyhCcU5SPVrutEykPY9cvIgp4XXWm9AHX6k Hkp2/L7IPE4w== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,237,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="509658124" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.209.124]) ([10.213.209.124]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Mar 2021 05:13:58 -0800 To: Kalesh A P , dev@dpdk.org Cc: ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com References: <20210224155553.26893-1-kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com> <20210224155553.26893-3-kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com> From: Ferruh Yigit X-User: ferruhy Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:13:51 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210224155553.26893-3-kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/11] net/bnxt: fix vnic configuration X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 2/24/2021 3:55 PM, Kalesh A P wrote: > From: Kalesh AP > > PMD should not set any flags to receive RoCE traffic while > configuring the vnic. Since the PMD does not support RoCE > some of the flags and code is unused. Clean it up. > > Fixes: b7778e8a1c00 ("net/bnxt: refactor to properly allocate resources for PF/VF") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Kalesh AP > Reviewed-by: Ajit Kumar Khaparde Hi Ajit, Can you please add 'VNIC' to 'devtools/words-case.txt' to be able to catch errors in patch title for it? Thanks, ferruh