From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9961C433EF for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C115208B0 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:45:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9C115208B0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937717AbeFSLpK (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:45:10 -0400 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:39048 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937592AbeFSLpJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:45:09 -0400 Received: from fsav301.sakura.ne.jp (fsav301.sakura.ne.jp [153.120.85.132]) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w5JBj1lN035015; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:45:01 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (202.181.97.72) by fsav301.sakura.ne.jp (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav301.sakura.ne.jp); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:45:01 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav301.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (softbank126074194044.bbtec.net [126.74.194.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5JBj0OU035005 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:45:01 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp) Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in __get_super To: syzbot , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com References: <001a113ed5540f411c0568cc8418@google.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk From: Tetsuo Handa Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:44:57 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <001a113ed5540f411c0568cc8418@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This bug report is getting no feedback, but I guess that this bug is in block or mm or locking layer rather than fs layer. NMI backtrace for this bug tends to report that sb_bread() from fill_super() from mount_bdev() is stalling is the cause of keep holding s_umount_key for more than 120 seconds. What is strange is that NMI backtrace for this bug tends to point at rcu_read_lock()/pagecache_get_page()/radix_tree_deref_slot()/ rcu_read_unlock() which is expected not to stall. Since CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT is set to 120 (and actually +5 due to CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y) which is longer than CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT, maybe setting CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT to smaller values (e.g. 25) can give us some hints...