From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Igor Grinberg Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:51:36 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: layerscape: Enable UUID & GPT partition for NXP's ARM SoC In-Reply-To: References: <1482734708-23418-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com> <757137c1-6823-cd5a-28ee-3bb7c2b3c61a@compulab.co.il> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 01/04/17 23:41, york sun wrote: > On 12/25/2016 11:29 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote: >> Hi Prabhakar Kushwaha, >> >> On 12/26/16 08:45, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: >>> Enable UUID and GPT partition support for NXP's ARM based SoCs >>> i.e. LS1012A, LS1021A, LS1043A, LS1046A and LS2080A. >>> >>> Also enable DOS partition for LS1012AFRDM boards. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha >>> --- >>> include/configs/ls1012afrdm.h | 5 +++++ >>> include/configs/ls1012aqds.h | 4 ++++ >>> include/configs/ls1012ardb.h | 4 ++++ >>> include/configs/ls1021aiot.h | 3 +++ >>> include/configs/ls1021aqds.h | 3 +++ >>> include/configs/ls1021atwr.h | 3 +++ >>> include/configs/ls1043aqds.h | 4 ++++ >>> include/configs/ls1043ardb.h | 4 ++++ >>> include/configs/ls1046aqds.h | 4 ++++ >>> include/configs/ls1046ardb.h | 4 ++++ >>> include/configs/ls2080aqds.h | 3 +++ >>> include/configs/ls2080ardb.h | 3 +++ >> >> I'm not sure this is the expected way today... >> >>> 12 files changed, 44 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/include/configs/ls1012afrdm.h b/include/configs/ls1012afrdm.h >>> index f6f88e8..94f7460 100644 >>> --- a/include/configs/ls1012afrdm.h >>> +++ b/include/configs/ls1012afrdm.h >>> @@ -42,6 +42,11 @@ >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_USB_XHCI_MAX_ROOT_PORTS 2 >>> #endif >>> >>> +#define CONFIG_DOS_PARTITION >>> +#define CONFIG_PARTITION_UUIDS >>> +#define CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION >>> +#define CONFIG_CMD_GPT >>> + >> >> These are the common (not board specific) things and I think today we expect >> it to come through the Kconfig instead of the old config files. > > Igor, > > They are not totally common. The board has to support the device. I > would recommend to use Kconfig as well if such config is in Kconfig. > However it is not the case here. Right. They are not in Kconfig yet... We are making efforts to move stuff to Kconfig. Care to land a hand and move these ones to Kconfig? -- Regards, Igor.