All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Serge Guelton <sguelton@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Portable inline asm to get address of TLS variable
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 23:28:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a35b3b64-2e6b-2a43-9f2b-ab3ba322bbea@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yg04Y05ccrbFVmG/@stefanha-x1.localdomain>

On 2/16/22 18:46, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> However, I wonder if the compiler might reuse a register that already
> contains the address. Then we'd have the coroutine problem again when
> qemu_coroutine_yield() is called between the earlier address calculation
> and the asm volatile statement.

Yes, the compiler should be able to reuse the register.  volatile only 
says that the contents of the "asm" cannot be subject to e.g. loop 
optimizations:

	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
		asm("# assembly": "=r"(k) : "0"(10));
		j += k;
	}

will likely execute the asm once, while "asm volatile" (or an asm 
without inputs, which is always volatile) will execute it ten times.

However, the input of the assembly can be evaluated only once either 
way.  For example, in the case above you might have "movl $10, %edx" 
outside the loop even with asm volatile.

One way to fix it for modules could be to define a (global, non-TLS) 
variable in QEMU with the %fs-based offset of the relevant thread-local 
variable, and initialize it before modules are loaded.

Paolo


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-16 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-16 17:46 Portable inline asm to get address of TLS variable Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-02-16 18:13 ` Florian Weimer
2022-02-16 20:28   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-02-16 20:33     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-02-16 20:46       ` Florian Weimer
2022-02-17  9:30         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-02-16 20:40     ` Florian Weimer
2022-02-17  9:28       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-02-17 11:40         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-17 15:02           ` Serge Guelton
2022-02-17 15:11             ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-02-17 15:51             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-17 14:59         ` Serge Guelton
2022-03-01 11:54         ` Florian Weimer
2022-03-01 13:39           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-04-19 11:32             ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-19 18:38               ` Thomas Rodgers
2022-04-20 14:12               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-02-16 22:28 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a35b3b64-2e6b-2a43-9f2b-ab3ba322bbea@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=sguelton@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.