From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <joe@perches.com>
Received: from smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.36])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52079ACA
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:10:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0199.hostedemail.com
	[216.40.44.199])
	by smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DF811DAB9
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:10:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <a401f973508662fa241b1410e08480884baca606.camel@perches.com>
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:10:40 -0700
In-Reply-To: <800b68eb-9cf4-9c72-104d-0d4d9ae26ea1@infradead.org>
References: <1540066514.3464.22.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
	<20181022211025.GA8911@kroah.com>
	<23e41205115d317908c63d37a20ee316b44a8404.camel@perches.com>
	<800b68eb-9cf4-9c72-104d-0d4d9ae26ea1@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 23:05 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/22/18 9:16 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > As James Bottomley has suggested multiple times,
> > I'd much rather kernel development use the debian
> > code of conduct verbatim than even this modified one.
> > 
> > https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct
> 
> Yes, that and the Samba URL are good.
> 
> And it's disappointing how patches from James are acked or reviewed on the
> mailing lists and then mostly ignored (until the maintainer summit) while
> other patches are merged into the mainline git tree.
> 
> It seems to be very one-sided.

Perhaps an apt description is 'cabal like'.