From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com (unknown [60.244.123.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 330384C95 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:05:06 +0000 (UTC) X-UUID: af663d45d92c4ba1a42c524ddf8e21a2-20220916 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=TYyYRhoJq7fWtmZNRUDZ326SnABMO3rCDovRyIC+c2k=; b=kncM31WKnOLsgTEKsKE/RJkyDjYVEa2dPq9mKhAREVtlkwJYUSfwiR8ftWlIFGLUYMbALORkQEhe7LN3fj3cHlmc76KGL8/PlMpII6kHck8iqjzBGs7wZ+tz9Le0FFeOuIWwz2Hp56Ah186dUazIBSRGKIsw7ledlw75W6H60/M=; X-CID-P-RULE: Release_Ham X-CID-O-INFO: VERSION:1.1.11,REQID:b9341035-ea49-4508-98d5-94a38cd617c2,IP:0,U RL:0,TC:0,Content:0,EDM:0,RT:0,SF:0,FILE:0,BULK:0,RULE:Release_Ham,ACTION: release,TS:0 X-CID-META: VersionHash:39a5ff1,CLOUDID:68faa8f6-6e85-48d9-afd8-0504bbfe04cb,B ulkID:nil,BulkQuantity:0,Recheck:0,SF:nil,TC:nil,Content:0,EDM:-3,IP:nil,U RL:0,File:nil,Bulk:nil,QS:nil,BEC:nil,COL:0 X-UUID: af663d45d92c4ba1a42c524ddf8e21a2-20220916 Received: from mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.183)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (Generic MTA with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 846511512; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:59:52 +0800 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.40) by mtkmbs11n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.187) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:59:50 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07 (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:59:50 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] remoteproc: mediatek: Support probing for the 2nd core of dual-core SCP From: TingHan Shen To: Mathieu Poirier CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:59:50 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20220829194247.GC2264818@p14s> <20220908111757.14633-1-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MTK: N On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 14:58 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 05:21, Tinghan Shen > wrote: > > > Hi Mathieu, > > > > > > The mtk_scp.c driver only supports the single core SCP and the > > > > 1st core of a dual-core SCP. This patch extends it for the 2nd core. > > > > > > > > MT8195 SCP is a dual-core MCU. Both cores are housed in the same > > > > subsys. > > > > > > s/subsys/subsystem > > > > > > > They have the same viewpoint of registers and memory. > > > > > > > > Core 1 of the SCP features its own set of core configuration registers, > > > > interrupt controller, timers, and DMAs. The rest of the peripherals > > > > in this subsystem are shared by core 0 and core 1. > > > > > > > > As for memory, core 1 has its own cache memory. the SCP SRAM is shared > > > > > > /the/The > > > > > > > by core 0 and core 1. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen > > > > --- > > > > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > > > > b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > > > > index 3510c6d0bbc8..91b4aefde4ac 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > > > > @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ > > > > #define MAX_CODE_SIZE 0x500000 > > > > #define SECTION_NAME_IPI_BUFFER ".ipi_buffer" > > > > > > > > +#define SCP_CORE_0 0 > > > > +#define SCP_CORE_1 1 > > > > +#define SCP_CORE_SINGLE 0xF > > > > + > > > > /** > > > > * scp_get() - get a reference to SCP. > > > > * > > > > @@ -836,6 +840,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > struct resource *res; > > > > const char *fw_name = "scp.img"; > > > > int ret, i; > > > > + u32 core_id = SCP_CORE_SINGLE; > > > > > > > > ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name); > > > > if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) > > > > @@ -851,8 +856,16 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); > > > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp); > > > > > > > > + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(dev->of_node, > > > > "mediatek,scp-core", 1, &core_id); > > > > + if (ret == 0) > > > > + dev_info(dev, "Boot SCP dual core %u\n", core_id); > > > > > > Why is the DT property "mediatek,scp-core" needed at all? Since the > > > > compatible > > > "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual" has already been defined previously in this > > > > patchset, > > > initialising the second core, if present, is a matter of looking at the > > > compatile string. > > > > This idea of identify cores by the compatible looks workable. > > I'll update this series at next version. > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > + > > > > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram"); > > > > - scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > > > > + if (core_id == SCP_CORE_1) > > > > + scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, > > > > resource_size(res)); > > > > + else > > > > + scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > > > > + > > > > > > This looks very broken... For this to work you would need to have two DT > > > entries with the "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual" compatible properly, one with > > > "mediatek,scp-core = <&scp_dual1 0>;" and another one with > > > > "mediatek,scp-core = <&scp_dual0 1>;". > > > > > > Which is also very broken... Here you have a binding whose first > > > > argument is a > > > reference to the core sibling while the second argument is a > > > > characteristic of > > > the current core, which is highly confusing. > > > > > > I suggest what when you see the compatible binding > > > > "mediatek,mt8195-scp", a > > > single core is initialized. If you see "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", both > > > > cores > > > are initialized as part of the _same_ probe. > > > > > > If the above analysis is not correct it means I misinterpreted your > > > work and if so, a serious amount of comments is needed _and_ a very > > > > detailed > > > example in "mtk,scp.yaml" that leaves no room for interpretation. > > > > > > I will stop reviewing this patchset until you have clarified how this > > > > works. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mathieu > > > > There's one problem of initializng the CORE1 using the same probe flow. > > The register space of CORE0 and CORE1 are overlapped in the device node. > > Both cores need to use the 'cfg' registers defined in scp yaml. > > The devm_ioremap_resource catches address overlapping and returns error > > when > > probing CORE1 driver. > > > > That is exactly why I suggest to initialise both cores within the same > probe() function. > Hi Mathieu, I'm thinking about how to initialise in the same probe() function. I'm wondering if this implies that using one scp driver to initialize 2 cores? If it is, I assume the dts descriptions for both cores should be contained in one node. When there's one node for both cores, it looks like that there is a problem of using dma_allocate_coherent(). Each core has its own reserved memory region. When there's only one device for both cores, it's not able to identify the memory region by the device parameter of dma_allocate_coherent(). Is it acceptable to consider manually allocating core 1 device in the probe() when probing core 0? Best regards, TingHan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10838C54EE9 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:01:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=alIYqkvuxBBTVReTLeUbRF2VvuHoHiCKOdTSzUN7MIk=; b=UHoe2o84C1l6Sx xq7DEPFVnYoJgnWAxtvWQp0IV8MTl6pbyujIVekUGwlgECjZdvGNKMFetkag13EV2py4d9c0oCVF2 BXeMJtVpp5x5WBrtd4Kkdk0aPU9g/EnOrdzQKTi98ZMczo4Woh7QDH5yKYXCPhXMN8AEOwSqbk2TW FDTQomCxd7Fx7+8qUX5gYbFJUVOTUCZpUfAxDKcixlTBC2PZBjvUOXB2fWRwXIYk5oMjDrgEL0Ohq FF0k829fffZF8KZnLrmV+/T0+ZrUJEHAIhhl12zpsBMWrMYebFXEPAIli1ltkoTGQX/PAofGbgPfD wdIkGT5KQ9Sju861HZcQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oZA0u-00CxYA-Q0; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:00:08 +0000 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oZA0q-00CxTL-Cs; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:00:06 +0000 X-UUID: 8c3a3c72a3a640b78e7d717307c62390-20220916 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=TYyYRhoJq7fWtmZNRUDZ326SnABMO3rCDovRyIC+c2k=; b=kncM31WKnOLsgTEKsKE/RJkyDjYVEa2dPq9mKhAREVtlkwJYUSfwiR8ftWlIFGLUYMbALORkQEhe7LN3fj3cHlmc76KGL8/PlMpII6kHck8iqjzBGs7wZ+tz9Le0FFeOuIWwz2Hp56Ah186dUazIBSRGKIsw7ledlw75W6H60/M=; X-CID-P-RULE: Release_Ham X-CID-O-INFO: VERSION:1.1.11,REQID:bf01c9ad-5cdf-410b-af43-72f65054b17f,IP:0,U RL:0,TC:0,Content:0,EDM:0,RT:0,SF:0,FILE:0,BULK:0,RULE:Release_Ham,ACTION: release,TS:0 X-CID-META: VersionHash:39a5ff1,CLOUDID:56c76782-e1c0-45d0-a056-c64d28f12f02,B ulkID:nil,BulkQuantity:0,Recheck:0,SF:nil,TC:nil,Content:0,EDM:-3,IP:nil,U RL:0,File:nil,Bulk:nil,QS:nil,BEC:nil,COL:0 X-UUID: 8c3a3c72a3a640b78e7d717307c62390-20220916 Received: from mtkmbs11n1.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.185)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1100365095; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 04:59:53 -0700 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.40) by mtkmbs11n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.187) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:59:50 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07 (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:59:50 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] remoteproc: mediatek: Support probing for the 2nd core of dual-core SCP From: TingHan Shen To: Mathieu Poirier CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:59:50 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20220829194247.GC2264818@p14s> <20220908111757.14633-1-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220916_050004_497783_0018F1A2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 48.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 14:58 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 05:21, Tinghan Shen > wrote: > > > Hi Mathieu, > > > > > > The mtk_scp.c driver only supports the single core SCP and the > > > > 1st core of a dual-core SCP. This patch extends it for the 2nd core. > > > > > > > > MT8195 SCP is a dual-core MCU. Both cores are housed in the same > > > > subsys. > > > > > > s/subsys/subsystem > > > > > > > They have the same viewpoint of registers and memory. > > > > > > > > Core 1 of the SCP features its own set of core configuration registers, > > > > interrupt controller, timers, and DMAs. The rest of the peripherals > > > > in this subsystem are shared by core 0 and core 1. > > > > > > > > As for memory, core 1 has its own cache memory. the SCP SRAM is shared > > > > > > /the/The > > > > > > > by core 0 and core 1. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen > > > > --- > > > > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > > > > b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > > > > index 3510c6d0bbc8..91b4aefde4ac 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > > > > @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ > > > > #define MAX_CODE_SIZE 0x500000 > > > > #define SECTION_NAME_IPI_BUFFER ".ipi_buffer" > > > > > > > > +#define SCP_CORE_0 0 > > > > +#define SCP_CORE_1 1 > > > > +#define SCP_CORE_SINGLE 0xF > > > > + > > > > /** > > > > * scp_get() - get a reference to SCP. > > > > * > > > > @@ -836,6 +840,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > struct resource *res; > > > > const char *fw_name = "scp.img"; > > > > int ret, i; > > > > + u32 core_id = SCP_CORE_SINGLE; > > > > > > > > ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name); > > > > if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) > > > > @@ -851,8 +856,16 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); > > > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp); > > > > > > > > + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(dev->of_node, > > > > "mediatek,scp-core", 1, &core_id); > > > > + if (ret == 0) > > > > + dev_info(dev, "Boot SCP dual core %u\n", core_id); > > > > > > Why is the DT property "mediatek,scp-core" needed at all? Since the > > > > compatible > > > "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual" has already been defined previously in this > > > > patchset, > > > initialising the second core, if present, is a matter of looking at the > > > compatile string. > > > > This idea of identify cores by the compatible looks workable. > > I'll update this series at next version. > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > + > > > > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram"); > > > > - scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > > > > + if (core_id == SCP_CORE_1) > > > > + scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, > > > > resource_size(res)); > > > > + else > > > > + scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > > > > + > > > > > > This looks very broken... For this to work you would need to have two DT > > > entries with the "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual" compatible properly, one with > > > "mediatek,scp-core = <&scp_dual1 0>;" and another one with > > > > "mediatek,scp-core = <&scp_dual0 1>;". > > > > > > Which is also very broken... Here you have a binding whose first > > > > argument is a > > > reference to the core sibling while the second argument is a > > > > characteristic of > > > the current core, which is highly confusing. > > > > > > I suggest what when you see the compatible binding > > > > "mediatek,mt8195-scp", a > > > single core is initialized. If you see "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", both > > > > cores > > > are initialized as part of the _same_ probe. > > > > > > If the above analysis is not correct it means I misinterpreted your > > > work and if so, a serious amount of comments is needed _and_ a very > > > > detailed > > > example in "mtk,scp.yaml" that leaves no room for interpretation. > > > > > > I will stop reviewing this patchset until you have clarified how this > > > > works. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mathieu > > > > There's one problem of initializng the CORE1 using the same probe flow. > > The register space of CORE0 and CORE1 are overlapped in the device node. > > Both cores need to use the 'cfg' registers defined in scp yaml. > > The devm_ioremap_resource catches address overlapping and returns error > > when > > probing CORE1 driver. > > > > That is exactly why I suggest to initialise both cores within the same > probe() function. > Hi Mathieu, I'm thinking about how to initialise in the same probe() function. I'm wondering if this implies that using one scp driver to initialize 2 cores? If it is, I assume the dts descriptions for both cores should be contained in one node. When there's one node for both cores, it looks like that there is a problem of using dma_allocate_coherent(). Each core has its own reserved memory region. When there's only one device for both cores, it's not able to identify the memory region by the device parameter of dma_allocate_coherent(). Is it acceptable to consider manually allocating core 1 device in the probe() when probing core 0? Best regards, TingHan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel