From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Re: KMSAN: uninit-value in can_receive Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:25:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <0000000000005c08d10597a3a05d@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <0000000000005c08d10597a3a05d@google.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: syzbot , davem@davemloft.net, glider@google.com, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mkl@pengutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com List-Id: linux-can.vger.kernel.org On 18/11/2019 20.05, syzbot wrote: > Hello, > > syzbot found the following crash on: > > HEAD commit:    9c6a7162 kmsan: remove unneeded annotations in bio > git tree:       https://github.com/google/kmsan.git master > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14563416e00000 > kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=9e324dfe9c7b0360 > dashboard link: > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b02ff0707a97e4e79ebb > compiler:       clang version 9.0.0 (/home/glider/llvm/clang > 80fee25776c2fb61e74c1ecb1a523375c2500b69) > > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet. > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit: > Reported-by: syzbot+b02ff0707a97e4e79ebb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > ===================================================== > BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in can_receive+0x23c/0x5e0 net/can/af_can.c:649 > CPU: 1 PID: 3490 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc5+ #0 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS > Google 01/01/2011 > Call Trace: >   >  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] >  dump_stack+0x191/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 >  kmsan_report+0x128/0x220 mm/kmsan/kmsan_report.c:108 >  __msan_warning+0x73/0xe0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:245 >  can_receive+0x23c/0x5e0 net/can/af_can.c:649 >  can_rcv+0x188/0x3a0 net/can/af_can.c:685 In line 649 of 5.4.0-rc5+ we can find a while() statement: while (!(can_skb_prv(skb)->skbcnt)) can_skb_prv(skb)->skbcnt = atomic_inc_return(&skbcounter); In linux/include/linux/can/skb.h we see: static inline struct can_skb_priv *can_skb_prv(struct sk_buff *skb) { return (struct can_skb_priv *)(skb->head); } IMO accessing can_skb_prv(skb)->skbcnt at this point is a valid operation which has no uninitialized value. Can this probably be a false positive of KMSAN? Regards, Oliver