All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/24] st: return error code in st_scsi_execute()
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 08:28:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a74e0dce-76c1-75b1-1ac7-5c758e096094@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a5ac65a-b765-df88-0613-455f3d4cab46@acm.org>

On 10/21/19 6:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/21/19 2:53 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> We should return the actual error code in st_scsi_execute(),
>> avoiding the need to use DRIVER_ERROR.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
>> ---
>>   drivers/scsi/st.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/st.c b/drivers/scsi/st.c
>> index e3266a64a477..5f38369cc62f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/st.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/st.c
>> @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static int st_scsi_execute(struct st_request
>> *SRpnt, const unsigned char *cmd,
>>               data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ?
>>               REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, 0);
>>       if (IS_ERR(req))
>> -        return DRIVER_ERROR << 24;
>> +        return PTR_ERR(req);
>>       rq = scsi_req(req);
>>       req->rq_flags |= RQF_QUIET;
>>   @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static int st_scsi_execute(struct st_request
>> *SRpnt, const unsigned char *cmd,
>>                         GFP_KERNEL);
>>           if (err) {
>>               blk_put_request(req);
>> -            return DRIVER_ERROR << 24;
>> +            return err;
>>           }
>>       }
> 
> The patch description looks confusing to me. Is it perhaps because the
> caller compares the st_scsi_execute() return value with zero and doesn't
> use the return value in any other way that it is fine to return an
> integer error code instead of a SCSI status?
> 
Yes. The caller does:

	ret = st_scsi_execute(SRpnt, cmd, direction, NULL, bytes, timeout,
			      retries);
	if (ret) {
		/* could not allocate the buffer or request was too large */
		(STp->buffer)->syscall_result = (-EBUSY);
		(STp->buffer)->last_SRpnt = NULL;

So it's immaterial _what_ we return here as long as it's non-zero.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 247165 (AG München), GF: Felix Imendörffer

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-22  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-21  9:52 [PATCH RFC 00/24] scsi: Revamp result values Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:52 ` [PATCH 01/24] aic7xxx,aic79xxx: remove driver-defined SAM status definitions Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 02/24] bfa: drop driver-defined SCSI status codes Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 03/24] wd33c93: use SCSI status Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21 18:41   ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-21 18:41     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-21 23:16   ` Finn Thain
2019-10-22  5:59     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 04/24] acornscsi: use standard defines Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 05/24] scsi: use standard SAM status codes Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21 23:17   ` Finn Thain
2019-10-22  6:00     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 06/24] scsi: change status_byte() to return the standard SCSI status Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-22 12:35   ` Steffen Maier
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 07/24] target_core: Fixup target_complete_cmd() usage Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 08/24] sg: use SAM status definitions and avoid using masked_status Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 09/24] scsi: Kill obsolete linux-specific status codes Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21 18:12   ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-21 18:12     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-21 18:56   ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-21 18:56     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 10/24] scsi: introduce set_status_byte() Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21 22:12   ` Finn Thain
2019-10-22  5:56     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 11/24] advansys: kill driver_defined status byte accessors Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21 16:37   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-22  6:25     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 12/24] scsi: introduce scsi_build_sense() Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21 23:31   ` Finn Thain
2019-10-22  6:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-22 12:21   ` Steffen Maier
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 13/24] scsi: Kill DRIVER_SENSE Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21 23:44   ` Finn Thain
2019-10-22  6:10     ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-04  6:40   ` Jiri Slaby
2021-06-07 12:21     ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-07 12:30       ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-06-07 13:02         ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-10 10:52           ` Jiri Slaby
2021-06-10 14:01             ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-11  4:50               ` Jiri Slaby
2021-06-11  7:38                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-14  6:29                   ` Jiri Slaby
2021-06-14  7:20                   ` Jiri Slaby
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 14/24] scsi: Kill DRIVER_HARD Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 15/24] scsi_error: use DID_TIME_OUT instead of DRIVER_TIMEOUT Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 16/24] scsi: Kill DRIVER_TIMEOUT Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 17/24] scsi: do not use DRIVER_INVALID Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 18/24] st: return error code in st_scsi_execute() Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21 16:41   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-22  6:28     ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2019-10-22 14:54       ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 19/24] scsi_ioctl: return error code when blk_map_user() fails Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21 16:44   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-22  6:32     ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 20/24] scsi_dh_alua: do not interpret DRIVER_ERROR Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 21/24] xen-scsiback: stop using DRIVER_ERROR Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 22/24] scsi: " Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 23/24] scsi: Kill DRIVER_MEDIA, DRIVER_SOFT, and DRIVER_BUSY Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21  9:53 ` [PATCH 24/24] scsi: Drop now obsolete driver_byte definitions Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH RFC 00/24] scsi: Revamp result values Douglas Gilbert
2019-10-21 23:20   ` Finn Thain
2019-10-22  6:24   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-31 11:04 [PATCHv2 00/24] Revamp SCSI " Hannes Reinecke
2019-10-31 11:04 ` [PATCH 18/24] st: return error code in st_scsi_execute() Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a74e0dce-76c1-75b1-1ac7-5c758e096094@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.