From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: PATCH: RFC: Broadcom serdev driver To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" , Loic Poulain , Rob Herring References: From: Ian Molton Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 10:46:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: On 08/07/17 08:58, Marcel Holtmann wrote: >> One oddity I've spotted is that the chip tries to go back to 115200 baud >> after loading its firmware patch, which messes up the change to >> oper_speed. I've worked around this by not using the set_baudrate hook, >> just setting the operating speed after firmware loading in setup. > > I assume we addressed that in hci_uart. If not then we need to handle that there first. In hci_uart_setup() in hci_serdev.c, there is the following: if (hu->init_speed) speed = hu->init_speed; else if (hu->proto->init_speed) speed = hu->proto->init_speed; else speed = 0; if (speed) serdev_device_set_baudrate(hu->serdev, speed); /* Operational speed if any */ if (hu->oper_speed) speed = hu->oper_speed; else if (hu->proto->oper_speed) speed = hu->proto->oper_speed; else speed = 0; if (hu->proto->set_baudrate && speed) { err = hu->proto->set_baudrate(hu, speed); if (err) BT_ERR("%s: failed to set baudrate", hdev->name); else serdev_device_set_baudrate(hu->serdev, speed); } if (hu->proto->setup) return hu->proto->setup(hu); The problem is that it attempts to set the baudrate to oper_speed *prior* to calling the driver's setup() hook. It *seems* simple enough that we could move the setup call to prior to the change to oper_speed, but I am unsure how this might affect other drivers. I can test this on my driver (and implement the set_baudrate command properly as a result. I can send a patch to this effect if you want? -Ian